[2015] KEHC 5740 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 5740 (KLR)

The court found that there was no copy of the ruling allegedly delivered on 11th December, 2014 in the record, yet orders and warrants of arrest had been issued based on that ruling. The absence of the ruling rendered all subsequent proceedings and orders irregular and a nullity. Exercising its revisionary powers,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 5740 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Vivian Chemngetich; Defendant: David Kirui
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Revision Case 47 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Revision / Ruling
Outcome
Orders and warrants of arrest based on the non-existent ruling are vacated; matter to proceed before a different court; main suit to be listed for hearing on priority basis.
Judges
A Mshila
Legal Topics
Children Act Procedure, Revisionary Jurisdiction, Irregularity in Proceedings
Source Language
en
Family and Children Children Act Procedure Revisionary Jurisdiction Irregularity in Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vivian Chemngetich

Plaintiff

David Kirui

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether proceedings and orders based on a non-existent ruling are valid.
  2. 2 Whether the court can suo moto correct irregularities in the record.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no copy of the ruling allegedly delivered on 11th December, 2014 in the record, yet orders and warrants of arrest had been issued based on that ruling. The absence of the ruling rendered all subsequent proceedings and orders irregular and a nullity. Exercising its revisionary powers, the court held that it could correct such irregularities on its own motion (suo moto), and therefore vacated all orders and lifted the warrants of arrest issued against the defendant. The court further directed that the matter proceed before a different court with competent jurisdiction and that the main suit be listed for hearing on a priority basis.

Court Disposition

Orders and warrants of arrest based on the non-existent ruling are vacated; matter to proceed before a different court; main suit to be listed for hearing on priority basis.

Orders

  • All orders emanating from the ruling are hereby vacated and the warrants of arrest against the defendant are hereby lifted.
  • The matter to proceed before any other court with competent jurisdiction apart from court No.12.