[2003] KECA 205 (KLR)

[2003] KECA 205 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction under its rules to revive an abated appeal, as there is no provision authorizing such revival or granting the court such power. The rules governing appeals differ from those applicable to suits in the High Court, where express provision exists for revival of abated suits....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] KECA 205 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Vyatu Limited & Another; Respondent: Public Trustee, Nyanza Province
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 218 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Revival of Abated Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Appeal Abatement, Extension of Time, Substitution of Legal Representative
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Abatement Extension of Time Substitution of Legal Representative

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vyatu Limited & Another

Applicant

Public Trustee, Nyanza Province

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Revival of Abated Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to revive an abated appeal under its rules.
  2. 2 Whether time can be extended to substitute a legal representative after abatement of the appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the Public Trustee was properly appointed as legal representative of the deceased respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction under its rules to revive an abated appeal, as there is no provision authorizing such revival or granting the court such power. The rules governing appeals differ from those applicable to suits in the High Court, where express provision exists for revival of abated suits. Furthermore, the Public Trustee was not properly appointed as legal representative of the deceased respondent, as no letters of administration or limited grant had been issued; the High Court order only appointed the Public Trustee as interim administrator for the limited purpose of receiving the decretal sum and paying costs. Therefore, the application for extension of time to...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application for extension of time and revival of the abated appeal is dismissed with costs to the Public Trustee.