[2014] KEHC 5337 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner failed to inform the respondent or her advocate of the conditional payment of Kshs. 500,000 as required by the court's order. This omission led to the respondent instructing auctioneers to enforce the order, as they were unaware that payment had been made. The court held that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 5337 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: W N; Respondent: P B
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Matrimonial Case 8 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Matrimonial Cause / Ruling on Liability for Auctioneer's Fees
- Outcome
- Petitioner held liable for auctioneer's fees.
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Property Enforcement, Auctioneer Fees Liability
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W N
Petitioner
P B
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial Cause / Ruling on Liability for Auctioneer's Fees
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner is liable to pay the auctioneer's fees incurred by the respondent.
- 2 Whether the instruction to the auctioneer was premature given the thirty (30) day stay and conditional payment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner failed to inform the respondent or her advocate of the conditional payment of Kshs. 500,000 as required by the court's order. This omission led to the respondent instructing auctioneers to enforce the order, as they were unaware that payment had been made. The court held that the error which occasioned the instruction of the auctioneers was attributable to the petitioner's failure to communicate, and therefore, the petitioner is liable to pay the auctioneer's fees.
Court Disposition
Petitioner held liable for auctioneer's fees.
Orders
- The petitioner is liable to pay the auctioneer's fees.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
MATRIMONIAL CAUSE NO. 8 OF 2013
W N…………………….……………..…….PETITIONER
VERSUS
P B…………….………….……………….RESPONDENT
RULING
The issue in contention here is payment of the auctioneer’s fees. The advocates for the respondent proceeded to instruct auctioneers following the court’s ruling of 23rd August, 2013. At this point the petitioner rushed to court and sought and obtained on 27th September, 2013 a thirty (30) day stay. The petitioner submits that the decision to engage auctioneers was premature as the thirty (30) day period had not expired and the petitioner had already paid the Kshs. 500,000/= conditional payment into the respondent’s advocates account. Ms. Muyaa for the respondent counters that they were not informed of this deposit and thus had no knowledge that payment had been met. Thirty (30) days from 23rd August, 2013 taking day one as 24th August, 2013 expired on 22nd September, 2013. Thus the instruction to the auctioneer on 23rd September, 2013 did not fall within the thirty (30) day period. After seeking and obtaining the thirty (30) day leave on 23rd August, 2013 the petitioner took no further action. He did not file any appeal against the ruling and did not file a substantive motion for stay. It was only on 27th September, 2013 after proclamation that the petitioner rushed to court and obtained a stay. This stay was made conditional upon the petitioner depositing in court the sum of Kshs. 500,000/= within fifteen (15) days.
Upon making the required payment it was the responsibility of the petitioner to inform the respondent or her lawyer that payment had been made. His failure to do this cannot be blamed on the respondent. I therefore find that the error which occasioned the instruction of the auctioneers was a failure on the part of the petitioner. As such the petitioner is liable to pay the auctioneer’s fees. It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered in Mombasa this 9th day of May, 2014.
M. ODERO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Ms. Muyaa for Respondent
No appearance by Petitioner
Court Clerk Mutisya