[2023] KEELC 17987 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 17987 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant was properly served with summons and pleadings but failed to enter appearance or file a defence for over a year. In accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules, the court held that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment in default of appearance and defence. Consequently, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 17987 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Timothy Wacho (Legal representative of Naomi Subo Stephen); Defendant: Soka Gache
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E001 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Application for Default Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed. Judgment in default of appearance and defence entered against the defendant. Matter fixed for formal proof. Costs in the cause.
Judges
PM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Default Judgment, Service of Process, Formal Proof, Failure to Defend
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Default Judgment Service of Process Formal Proof Failure to Defend

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Timothy Wacho (Legal representative of Naomi Subo Stephen)

Plaintiff

Soka Gache

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Application for Default Judgment

  1. 1 Whether judgment in default of appearance and defence should be entered against the defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the matter should be fixed for formal proof.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant was properly served with summons and pleadings but failed to enter appearance or file a defence for over a year. In accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules, the court held that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment in default of appearance and defence. Consequently, the court directed that the matter be fixed for formal proof to determine the reliefs sought by the plaintiff. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Judgment in default of appearance and defence entered against the defendant. Matter fixed for formal proof. Costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Judgment in default of appearance and defence is entered against the defendant.
  • The matter is fixed for formal proof on July 17, 2022.