[2024] KEHC 15973 (KLR)
The High Court found that while the trial court was within its rights to impose a custodial sentence, the exclusive imposition of a three-year imprisonment term without the option of a fine was excessive in the circumstances. The court noted that assault is a misdemeanor and that the appellant's conduct, though...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 15973 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: George Wanjala Wafula; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E052 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed_in_part
- Judges
- REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Assault Offences, Judicial Discretion, Misdemeanour Classification
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Wanjala Wafula
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of three years imprisonment for assault was excessive.
- 2 Whether the appellant should have been given the option of a fine under Section 251 of the Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that while the trial court was within its rights to impose a custodial sentence, the exclusive imposition of a three-year imprisonment term without the option of a fine was excessive in the circumstances. The court noted that assault is a misdemeanor and that the appellant's conduct, though unwarranted, did not justify denying him the statutory option of a fine. The sentence of three years imprisonment was therefore set aside and substituted with a fine of Kshs. 100,000, with a default custodial sentence of three years. The period spent in remand was to be taken into account.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed_in_part
Orders
- The sentence of three years imprisonment is set aside.
- The appellant is sentenced to a fine of Kshs. 100,000, in default three years imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Wafula v Republic (Criminal Appeal E052 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 15973 (KLR) (12 November 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15973 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Bungoma
Criminal Appeal E052 of 2023
REA Ougo, J
November 12, 2024
Between
George Wanjala Wafula
Appellant
and
Republic
Respondent
Judgment
1. The Appellant was convicted of the offence of assault by the trial court and sentenced to three years imprisonment.
2. His appeal is solely on sentence. He states that the sentence meted against him was excessive. Under section 251 the sentence provided in law is five years. He was denied the option of fine.
3. The Respondent opposed the appeal stating that the sentence provided in law is five years and the sentence of three years was within the law. Reliance was made on the case of Bernard Kimani Gacheru-vs- Republic (2002) eKLR. It is further submitted that the appeal hasn’t brought some material facts that might have been overlooked by the lower court and acted on wrong principles.
4. I have considered the grounds, the submissions, and the law plus the facts that were before the trial court.
5. There is no dispute that the case against the appellant was proved beyond reasonable doubt. The conviction was proper. On sentence, the appellant contends that the three (3) years sentence was harsh and that the sentence was without an option of fine. Sentencing is at the discretion of the lower court. Under Section 251 of the Penal Code, one found guilty of the offence of assault can be sentenced to up to five (5) years imprisonment. The trial court in sentencing the appellant noted that the Appellant was arrogant and violent and that he attacked a teacher within the school compound before school children indeed his acts were unwarranted. However, in my view, the sentence of a custodial sentence only in the circumstances was excessive. The Appellant has sought an option for a fine. The offence of assault is classified as a misdemeanor in law.
6. In considering the appropriate sentence, I will give the appellant the option of a fine. The sentence of three imprisonment is set aside and I substitute it with the sentence of a fine of Kshs. 100,000/- in default three (3) years imprisonment. The period spent in remand shall be taken into account. The Appellant has a right of appeal within 14 days.
DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED AT BUNGOMA ON THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024. R. E. OUGOJUDGEIn the Presence of: -Appellant in person -PresentMiss Kibet -For the RespondentWilkister - C/A