[2024] KEHC 470 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 470 (KLR)

The court found that while the applicant had not addressed the issue of security for due performance, he had raised sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of stay of execution pending appeal. The court emphasized that the law requires provision of security, and thus allowed the application on condition that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 470 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Patrick Njiru Waganagwa; Respondent: Catherine Njeri Ngugi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 044 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed with conditions.
Judges
SN Mutuku
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Due Performance, Appeal Thresholds, Substantial Loss, Decretal Sum, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Security for Due Performance Appeal Thresholds Substantial Loss Decretal Sum Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Njiru Waganagwa

Appellant

Catherine Njeri Ngugi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has met the threshold for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has provided adequate security for the due performance of the decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the applicant had not addressed the issue of security for due performance, he had raised sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of stay of execution pending appeal. The court emphasized that the law requires provision of security, and thus allowed the application on condition that the applicant deposits the decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account held by both parties' advocates within 45 days. Failure to comply would result in automatic lapse of the stay order. The court also directed the applicant to file and serve the record of appeal within 60 days and set a mention date to confirm compliance. The decision balanced the applicant's right to appeal...

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed with conditions.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the judgment and decree in CMCC No. 131 of 2020 granted pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
  • Applicant to deposit the decretal sum in a joint interest earning account in the names of both advocates within 45 days; failure to comply results in lapse of stay order.