[2018] KEHC 2048 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2048 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant was bound by the terms of the written agreement, specifically clause 4, which required any dissatisfaction with the work to be reported in writing on the same working day. The appellant failed to comply with this contractual requirement and did not demonstrate that the respondent...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 2048 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Wahira Builders Ltd; Respondent: D.M. Enterprises Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 502 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Contract Enforcement, Breach of Contract, Construction Disputes
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Contract Enforcement Breach of Contract Construction Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wahira Builders Ltd

Appellant

D.M. Enterprises Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was liable to pay the outstanding contractual sum to the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent completed the works as per the contract and if the appellant's counterclaim for substandard work was valid.
  3. 3 Whether the trial court erred in relying on the written agreement, specifically clause 4, to dismiss the appellant's complaints.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant was bound by the terms of the written agreement, specifically clause 4, which required any dissatisfaction with the work to be reported in writing on the same working day. The appellant failed to comply with this contractual requirement and did not demonstrate that the respondent was in breach of the agreement. The trial court was correct in relying on the contract to determine the dispute, and there was no basis to interfere with its findings. Consequently, the appeal lacked merit and was dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.