[2020] KEHC 6007 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed Advocate/Client costs as per the certificate of taxation. However, interest at 14% per annum should accrue from 30 days after service of the bill of costs, not from the date claimed by the applicant. The evidence showed that service was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 6007 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Waiganjo Wachira & Co Advocates; Respondent: Pacis Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Children Miscellaneous Application 72 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs and Interest
- Outcome
- application allowed with modification as to the date interest accrues
- Judges
- BT Jaden
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Costs, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Waiganjo Wachira & Co Advocates
Applicant
Pacis Insurance Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs and Interest
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether judgment should be entered for the taxed Advocate/Client costs as per the certificate of taxation.
- 2 Whether interest on the taxed costs should accrue from the date claimed by the applicant or from a different date.
- 3 Whether the Bill of Costs is a nullity for alleged violation of Order 62A rule 3 of the Advocates Remuneration Order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed Advocate/Client costs as per the certificate of taxation. However, interest at 14% per annum should accrue from 30 days after service of the bill of costs, not from the date claimed by the applicant. The evidence showed that service was effected on 15th March, 2018, so interest accrues from 14th April, 2018. The respondent's argument that the Bill of Costs was a nullity under Order 62A rule 3 was rejected, as that provision only applies where there has been a change of advocates, which was not the case here.
Court Disposition
application allowed with modification as to the date interest accrues
Orders
- Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed Advocate/Client costs of Ksh.95,246 as per the certificate of taxation dated 11th February, 2019.
- Interest at 14% per annum to accrue from 14th April, 2018 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL DIVISION
HIGH COURT CIVIL MISC APPL. NO. 72 OF 2017
WAIGANJO WACHIRA & CO ADVOCATES.........APPLICANT
VERSUS
PACIS INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED.....RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. The application dated 19th February, 2019 seeks orders that judgment be entered for the taxed Advocate/Client costs of Ksh.95,246/= contained in the certificate of taxation dated 11th February, 2019 with interest thereon at the rate of 14% per annum with effect from 22nd January, 2018 until payment in full.
2. It is stated in the grounds and the affidavit in support of the application that the Advocate/Client Bill of Costs was taxed and a certificate of taxation issued for the sum of Ksh.95,246/=.
3. The application is opposed as per the grounds of opposition dated 2nd December, 2019 which are as follows:
“1). That the Bill of costs dated 3rd January, 2018 is a nullity in law as it violates the provisions of Order 62A rules 3 of the Advocates Remuneration Order.
2). That interest ought to be charged from the date of entry of judgment on taxed amount and not from the date of filing the Bill of Cost as sought in the instant application; noting that the taxed amount was an unliquidated sum which was not certain at the onset.”
4. I have considered the application and the response to the same.
5. On the question of interest, the Advocates (Remuneration Orders) Rule (7) states as follows:
“An advocate may charge interest at 14 per cent per annum on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from expiration of one month from the delivery of the bill to the client, providing such claim for interest is raised before the amount of the bill has been paid or tendered in full.”
6. The taxed costs therefore attract interest at 14% per annum with effect from 30 days after the service of the bill. Evidence of service must be availed (See example Kithi & Co. Advocates v Menengai Downs Ltd Nbi Misc. Appl. No. 1069 of 2013 and Kantai & Co. Advocates v Kenya Bus Services ltd [2006] eKLR.)
7. The ground that the Bill of costs violets Order 62A rule 3 of the Advocates Remuneration Order is misplaced. The said provision relates to a bill of costs wherein there has been a change of Advocates, which is not the case herein.
8. In the case at hand, interest is claimed from 22nd January, 2018. However, the Taxation Notice and the Bill of Costs were served on 15th March, 2018 according to the affidavit of service filed herein on 10th April, 2018. The interest of 14% per annum therefore ought to accrue with effect from 14th April, 2018.
9. With the foregoing, the application is allowed save for the change of date when interest should accrue. Orders accordingly.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 6th day of May, 2020
B.THURANIRA JADEN
JUDGE