[2020] KEHC 6089 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established that the advocate-client bill of costs was taxed and a certificate of taxation issued. There was no dispute as to retainer, no evidence of a pending reference, and no indication that the taxed costs had been set aside or vacated. The respondent did not oppose the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 6089 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Waiganjo Wachira & Co Advocates; Respondent: Pacis Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 637 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- Application allowed as prayed.
- Judges
- CM Kamau
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Entry of Judgment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Waiganjo Wachira & Co Advocates
Applicant
Pacis Insurance Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to entry of judgment for the taxed advocate-client costs as per the certificate of taxation.
- 2 Whether there is any valid opposition or reference challenging the taxed costs or certificate of taxation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established that the advocate-client bill of costs was taxed and a certificate of taxation issued. There was no dispute as to retainer, no evidence of a pending reference, and no indication that the taxed costs had been set aside or vacated. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court concluded that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as prayed, together with interest and costs.
Court Disposition
Application allowed as prayed.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed advocate-client costs of Kshs 74,271 as per the certificate of taxation dated 18th July 2019.
- Interest at 14% per annum from 31st October 2017 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO 637 OF 2017
WAIGANJO WACHIRA & CO ADVOCATES......ADVOCATES
VERSUS
PACIS INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED...................CLIENT
RULING
1. The Applicant’s Notice of Motion application dated 29th July 2019 and filed on 30th July 2019 sought entry of judgment for the taxed Advocate-Client Costs of Kshs 75,271/= contained in the Certificate of Taxation dated 18th July 2019 with interest thereon at the rate of fourteen (14%) per cent per annum with effect from 31st October 2017 until payment in full. It also prayed for costs to be awarded to the Applicant herein.
2. The said application was supported by the Affidavit of James Ichaura Wachira that was sworn on 29th July 2019. He stated that he was instructed by the Respondent herein to represent its insured in Nairobi Civil Case No 8223 of 2013 Phillip Kiplangat Towet vs Hurricane Cleaning Services Ltdand the firm of M/S Mbai Waweru & Co Advocates entered appearance for the opposing party.
3. He averred that on 31st October 2017, the Applicant filed an Advocate-Client Bill of Costs that was taxed at Kshs 74,271/= and a Certificate of Taxation was duly issued on 18th July 2019. It was his contention that it was in the interests of justice that judgment be entered as had been sought by the Applicant herein so that it could recover the full amount due to it.
4. On 16th October 2019, this court granted the Respondent herein an opportunity to file its response and Written submissions in respect of the present application. However, as at the time it reserved its Ruling, the Respondent had not filed the aforesaid documentation.
5. It was therefore apparent that the present application was unopposed. However, the court could not grant the orders sought as a matter of course and therefore carefully considered the said application.
6. A perusal of the Affidavit of James Ichaura Wachira, advocate, and the grounds on the face of the present application showed that the Advocate-Client Bill of Costs was taxed and a Certificate of Costs issued as aforesaid. There was no dispute on retainer of the Applicant by the Respondent. There was also no evidence that the Respondent had filed a reference that was pending hearing and/or determination and/or that the aforesaid Taxed Costs had been set aside and/or vacated.
7. As advocates do not offer any charity work to clients when they offer their legal services and must then be paid their dues, this court came to the firm conclusion that the Applicant had satisfied it that it was entitled to the said costs.
DISPOSITION
8. Accordingly, the upshot of this court’s ruling was that the Applicant’s Notice of Motion application dated 29th July 2019 and filed on 30th July 2019 was merited and the same is hereby allowed as prayed.
9. It is so ordered.
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 7thday of May2020
J. KAMAU
JUDGE