[2002] KECA 21 (KLR)
The court did not proceed to determine the merits of the application for extension of time as neither party nor their advocates appeared. The matter was adjourned generally, and the Deputy Registrar was directed to seek an explanation from the advocates regarding their absence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KECA 21 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Wainaina Kihiko "A"; Respondent: Kariuki Kihiko
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 98 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to Serve Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application adjourned generally; no substantive orders on the merits.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Appellate Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wainaina Kihiko "A"
Applicant
Kariuki Kihiko
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to Serve Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to serve a notice of appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court did not proceed to determine the merits of the application for extension of time as neither party nor their advocates appeared. The matter was adjourned generally, and the Deputy Registrar was directed to seek an explanation from the advocates regarding their absence.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned generally; no substantive orders on the merits.
Orders
- Application stood over generally.
- Deputy Registrar to seek explanation from the advocates for their absence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: OMOLO, JA (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI.98 OF 2002
BETWEEN
WAINAINA KIHIKO "A" ...................................... APPLICANT
AND
KARIUKI KIHIKO ............................................. RESPONDENT
(An appliction for extension of time to serve a notice of appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Mr. Justice Khamoni) dated 25th March 1998
in
H.C.APP. NO. 134 OF 1994)
***********
O R D E R
Application adjourned and stood over generally. The Deputy Registrar of the court to seek an explanation from the advocates as to why they are not here.
Made at Nairobi this 15th day of October, 2002
R.S.C. OMOLO .................. JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR