[2025] KEELRC 1015 (KLR)

[2025] KEELRC 1015 (KLR)

The court found that the redundancy affecting the claimants was lawful, genuine, and conducted in accordance with the statutory procedure under the Employment Act. The claimants failed to prove that the redundancy was unfair or that they were entitled to compensation or further terminal dues beyond what had already...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELRC 1015 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Brigit Ochiche Obara; Applicant: Samuel Mburu Njuguna; Applicant: Michael Onyango Nyotumba; Respondent: Catholic University of Eastern Africa
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 550 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claims by Brigit Ochiche Obara and Samuel Mburu Njuguna dismissed; judgment for Michael Onyango Nyotumba for Kshs. 50,000 honorarium; no order as to costs.
Judges
MA Onyango
Legal Topics
Redundancy Procedure, Unfair Termination, Terminal Dues, Constructive Dismissal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Redundancy Procedure Unfair Termination Terminal Dues Constructive Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brigit Ochiche Obara

Applicant

Samuel Mburu Njuguna

Applicant

Michael Onyango Nyotumba

Applicant

Catholic University of Eastern Africa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the redundancy of the claimants was unfair or unlawful.
  2. 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to compensation and terminal dues beyond what was already paid.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent failed to remit deducted amounts and other employment-related payments.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the redundancy affecting the claimants was lawful, genuine, and conducted in accordance with the statutory procedure under the Employment Act. The claimants failed to prove that the redundancy was unfair or that they were entitled to compensation or further terminal dues beyond what had already been paid. Specifically, Brigit Ochiche Obara and Samuel Mburu Njuguna did not provide evidence to support their additional claims, and their claims were dismissed. Michael Onyango Nyotumba proved entitlement only to the honorarium for procurement committee service, which the respondent did not show had been paid. The court also noted that the matter had previously been...

Court Disposition

claims by Brigit Ochiche Obara and Samuel Mburu Njuguna dismissed; judgment for Michael Onyango Nyotumba for Kshs. 50,000 honorarium; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The claims by Brigit Ochiche Obara and Samuel Mburu Njuguna are dismissed.
  • Judgment is entered for Michael Onyango Nyotumba in the sum of Kshs. 50,000 for honorarium.