[2015] KEELRC 362 (KLR)
The court found that the Claimant's termination was procedurally and substantively unfair as she was not given notice to show cause, was not subjected to a disciplinary hearing, and was not paid terminal benefits upon termination. The Respondent failed to defend the claim or provide any justification for the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELRC 362 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Wairimu Kagunya; Respondent: Three Dee Enterprises Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 505 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Wrongful Termination, Terminal Benefits, Severance Pay, Notice Pay, Leave Entitlement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wairimu Kagunya
Claimant
Three Dee Enterprises Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was wrongful and unfair.
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to terminal benefits including payment in lieu of notice, accrued leave, severance pay, and compensation for unfair dismissal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Claimant's termination was procedurally and substantively unfair as she was not given notice to show cause, was not subjected to a disciplinary hearing, and was not paid terminal benefits upon termination. The Respondent failed to defend the claim or provide any justification for the dismissal. The Claimant was awarded payment in lieu of notice, accrued leave, severance pay, and compensation for unfair termination, as the employer's actions contravened statutory requirements and the employment contract. The court also considered the failure to provide a certificate of service as an aggravating factor in awarding compensation.
Court Disposition
claim allowed
Orders
- Respondent to pay Claimant Kshs.17,600 in lieu of notice.
- Respondent to pay Claimant Kshs.10,266.67 for accrued leave days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
43 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 505 OF 2014
WAIRIMU KAGUNYA……………. CLAIMANT
VERSUS
THREE DEE ENTERPRISES LIMITED ………..…. RESPONDENT
Mr. Kiarie for Claimant
JUDGMENT
The suit was brought via a memorandum of claim filed on 12th March 2014.
The Claimant seeks payment of terminal benefits to wit:
one (1) month’s salary in lieu of notice in the sum of Kshs.17,600. 00;
accrued leave days in the sum of Kshs.10,266. 67
unpaid house allowance for the period June to December 2012 in the sum of Kshs.16,180. 00;
severance pay at the rate of thirty (30) days for every completed year of service in the sum of Kshs.27,866. 67;
The Claimant also seeks compensation for wrongful dismissal from employment.
Particulars of claim
That the Claimant was employed by the Respondent on 1st June 2012 as a restaurant supervisor at a basic salary of Kshs.16,000. 00;
On 1st January 2013, the salary was reviewed to Kshs.17,600;
On 31st December 2013, the Claimant was sent home by Ms. Frida R. Madoka on allegations of misconduct.
The following day, the 1st January 2014, the Claimant was given a letter of termination of employment.
The Claimant was not paid terminal benefits upon termination. The Claimant refered the dispute to the Ministry of Labour but the same was not resolved.
The Claimant denies the alleged misconduct and states that the termination of employment was wrongful and unfair and claims compensation.
Determination
The claim is undefended and proceeded exparte.
In terms of the letter of appointment dated 1st June 2012, the Claimant received a gross salary and was therefore not entitled to house allowance in addition.
The claim for accrued leave days for the period January to December 2013 was substituted by the Claimant and same is awarded in the sum of Kshs.10,266. 67.
Payment in lieu of one month notice is provided in the letter of appointment and the same is awarded in the sum of Kshs.17,600. 00.
The claim for severance pay calculated at thirty (30) days for every completed year of service remains undefended. The same is proved and the Court awards Kshs.27,866. 67 accordingly.
Equally the Court is satisfied that the Claimant was not given a notice to show cause nor was he subjected to disciplinary hearing before the termination of his employment.
The Claimant was not paid any terminal benefits upon termination of employment.
No notice period was given to him and the loss of employment was abrupt and unexpected. He suffered loss and damage and is entitled to compensation in terms of Section 49(1)(c) of the Employment Act. The Claimant had served the Respondent for one (1) year and six (6) months and lost the means of livelihood and legitimate expectation of employment. The employer also failed to provide the Claimant with a certificate of service to ease his search for a new job. This is an aggravating factor. The Court awards the Claimant six (6) months salary as compensation for the wrongful and unfair termination of employment in the sum of Kshs.105,600.
In the final analysis the Court award is as follows;
Kshs.17,600. 00 in lieu of notice;
Kshs.10,266. 67 in lieu of leave days not taken;
Kshs.27,866. 67 severance pay;
Kshs.105,600 compensation;
certificate of service.
Total award Kshs.161,332.
The award is payable with interest from date of this judgment till payment in full.
The Respondent is to pay the costs of the suit.
Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 23rd day of October, 2015.
MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA
PRINCIPAL JUDGE