[2023] KEHC 3442 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 3442 (KLR)

The court held that since the applicant had already completed serving the sentence imposed by the trial court, there was no subsisting sentence or order for the High Court to revise under its revisionary jurisdiction. The application for revision was therefore overtaken by events and could not be entertained. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 3442 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Kuria Wairimu; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Revision Case E556 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
Application dismissed as overtaken by events; file closed.
Judges
HM Nyaga
Legal Topics
Malicious Damage to Property, Plea of Guilty, Sentence Completion
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Malicious Damage to Property Plea of Guilty Sentence Completion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Kuria Wairimu

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether there is any sentence left to be revised after the applicant has completed serving the imposed sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the applicant had already completed serving the sentence imposed by the trial court, there was no subsisting sentence or order for the High Court to revise under its revisionary jurisdiction. The application for revision was therefore overtaken by events and could not be entertained. The file was accordingly closed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed as overtaken by events; file closed.

Orders

  • The application for revision is overtaken by events and is hereby dismissed.
  • File closed.