[2023] KECPT 1061 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that only those items in the bill of costs that are expressly provided for under the Advocate Remuneration Order 2014 Schedule II could be allowed. Instruction fees were assessed at Kshs. 100,000, attendance fees at Kshs. 3,500, service of process at Kshs. 7,000, and disbursements at Kshs. 1,940....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KECPT 1061 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Edwin Maina Waithira; Respondent: Urithi Housing Cooperative Society Limited
- Court
- Cooperative Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 448 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Bill of Costs / Ruling on Taxation of Costs
- Outcome
- bill of costs taxed and allowed in part
- Judges
- BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, PO Aol
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Remuneration, Bill of Costs Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edwin Maina Waithira
Applicant
Urithi Housing Cooperative Society Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bill of Costs / Ruling on Taxation of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's bill of costs is properly drawn and should be taxed as presented.
- 2 What amounts are allowable under the Advocate Remuneration Order 2014 for the items claimed in the bill of costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that only those items in the bill of costs that are expressly provided for under the Advocate Remuneration Order 2014 Schedule II could be allowed. Instruction fees were assessed at Kshs. 100,000, attendance fees at Kshs. 3,500, service of process at Kshs. 7,000, and disbursements at Kshs. 1,940. All other items not provided for under the schedule were taxed at nil. The total bill of costs was therefore taxed at Kshs. 112,440. The Tribunal applied the relevant provisions of the Advocate Remuneration Order 2014 strictly, disallowing any claims not supported by the schedule.
Court Disposition
bill of costs taxed and allowed in part
Orders
- The respondent's bill of costs is taxed and allowed at Kshs. 112,440.
- All other items not provided for under the Advocate Remuneration Order 2014 Schedule II are taxed at nil.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
Waithira v Urithi Housing Cooperative Society Limited (Tribunal Case 448 of 2020) [2023] KECPT 1061 (KLR) (30 November 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KECPT 1061 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Cooperative Tribunal
Tribunal Case 448 of 2020
BM Kimemia, Chair, J. Mwatsama, Vice Chair, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki & PO Aol, Members
November 30, 2023
Between
Edwin Maina Waithira
Claimant
and
Urithi Housing Cooperative Society Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. The matter for determination is Respondent’s Bill of Cost dated 21. 2.2023. The respondents filed a Response in the form of written submissions dated 28. 7.2023. The said Bill of Cost is assessed as per the provisions of Schedule II Advocate Remuneration Order 2014. 1.Item 1 on Instructions Fees assessed at Kshs. 100,000/=.2. Items 2,3,4,5,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20,21,24,26,28,29,32,33,35,36,37,38,42,43, 44 and 46 are hereby taxed at NIL having not been provided for under the Schedule II(5 and 6).3. Items on Attendance 6,9,19,23,25,27 and 39 assessed at Kshs. 500/= each total Kshs. 3500/=.4. Service of Process and other service in items 7,22,34,40,41- taxed at Kshs. 1400/= each. Total at Kshs. 7000/=.5. Items on disbursements 30,31,47,48,49,50,51 and 52 assessed as drawn at Kshs. 100/=, Kshs. 100/=, Kshs. 690/=, Kshs. 325/=, Kshs. 150/=, Kshs. 200/=, Kshs. 200/= and Kshs. 175/= respectively. Total Kshs. 1940/=.We therefore tax the Bill of Cost total at Kshs. 112,440/=.(100,000+3500+7000+1940)
RULING SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023. ..............HON. BEATRICE KIMEMIACHAIRPERSON..............HON. J. MWATSAMADEPUTY CHAIRPERSON..............HON. BEATRICE SAWEMEMBER..............HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYAMEMBER..............HON. PHILIP GICHUKIMEMBER..............HON. PAUL AOLMEMBERIn the presence of:Ms. Kariuki advocate for the ClaimantEchon advocate for the Respondent.