[2022] KECA 1194 (KLR)

[2022] KECA 1194 (KLR)

The court considered that the applicants had previously filed a similar application for extension of time, which was dismissed for non-attendance. Upon receipt of the applicants' letter seeking to withdraw the current application, and having considered the respondents' grounds of opposition, the court exercised its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KECA 1194 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: David Kimengere Waititu & Davis Gitonga (Suing as the Personal Representatives of the Estate of the Late Benjamin Ithinyaui M’ Narangui - Deceased); Applicant: John Ngotho Ndurere & James Muthami Ndurere (Suing as the Personal Representatives of the Estate of the Late Ndurere Muhonyo Gathi - Deceased); Respondent: Angela Wairimu Gethi; Respondent: Murua Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application E036 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application withdrawn
Judges
F Sichale
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Withdrawal of Application, Environment and Land Court Judgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Withdrawal of Application Environment and Land Court Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Kimengere Waititu & Davis Gitonga (Suing as the Personal Representatives of the Estate of the Late Benjamin Ithinyaui M’ Narangui - Deceased)

Applicant

John Ngotho Ndurere & James Muthami Ndurere (Suing as the Personal Representatives of the Estate of the Late Ndurere Muhonyo Gathi - Deceased)

Applicant

Angela Wairimu Gethi

Respondent

Murua Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment of the Environment & Land Court.
  2. 2 Whether the application for extension of time should be withdrawn as requested by the applicants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered that the applicants had previously filed a similar application for extension of time, which was dismissed for non-attendance. Upon receipt of the applicants' letter seeking to withdraw the current application, and having considered the respondents' grounds of opposition, the court exercised its discretion to allow the withdrawal of the application. No order as to costs was made, effectively bringing the matter to a close without further proceedings on the merits of the extension of time.

Court Disposition

application withdrawn

Orders

  • The applicants' application dated June 23, 2022 is marked as withdrawn.
  • There is no order as to costs.