[2023] KEELC 17667 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 17667 (KLR)

The dominant issue in the dispute concerns a legal charge and a discharge entry over the suit property. The Court of Appeal has held that such disputes, including the validity of charges and the exercise of the statutory power of sale, are commercial matters for the High Court and not within the jurisdiction of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 17667 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Edward Waweru Wakabu; Defendant: Kiambu Unity Savings and Credit Co-operative Society Limited; Defendant: Land Registrar-Kiambu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Thika
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E090 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/jurisdiction and Interlocutory Applications
Outcome
suit struck out for want of jurisdiction
Judges
BM Eboso
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Elc, Statutory Power of Sale, Legal Charge Disputes, Fraudulent Discharge Entries
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Elc Statutory Power of Sale Legal Charge Disputes Fraudulent Discharge Entries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Waweru Wakabu

Plaintiff

Kiambu Unity Savings and Credit Co-operative Society Limited

Defendant

Land Registrar-Kiambu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/jurisdiction and Interlocutory Applications

  1. 1 Does the Environment and Land Court have jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes relating to charges and discharge of charges over land property.
  2. 2 Should the suit be struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The dominant issue in the dispute concerns a legal charge and a discharge entry over the suit property. The Court of Appeal has held that such disputes, including the validity of charges and the exercise of the statutory power of sale, are commercial matters for the High Court and not within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court. Guided by binding precedent and the principle that a court must not act without jurisdiction, the court found it had no jurisdiction and struck out the suit for want of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

suit struck out for want of jurisdiction

Orders

  • The suit is struck out for want of jurisdiction.
  • There will be no award of costs.