[2015] KECA 47 (KLR)

[2015] KECA 47 (KLR)

The Court, upon being informed by counsel for both parties that they had reached a consent, ordered by consent that the status quo be maintained pending the hearing and determination of Kisumu Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2015. The respondent was restrained from selling, parting with possession, transferring, or charging...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KECA 47 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Wallace Kipyegon Chamdany; Respondent: David Kipyegon Chepkwony
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 2 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed by consent; status quo maintained; stay of execution granted; costs in the appeal.
Judges
S ole Kantai
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Status Quo Orders, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Status Quo Orders Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wallace Kipyegon Chamdany

Applicant

David Kipyegon Chepkwony

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending the hearing and determination of Kisumu Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2015.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent should be restrained from dealing with the suit property pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the recovery of damages awarded against the appellant should be stayed.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court, upon being informed by counsel for both parties that they had reached a consent, ordered by consent that the status quo be maintained pending the hearing and determination of Kisumu Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2015. The respondent was restrained from selling, parting with possession, transferring, or charging the suit property, and there was a stay of execution to recover damages awarded against the appellant. The orders were made to preserve the subject matter of the appeal and ensure that the appeal, if successful, would not be rendered nugatory. Costs of the application were ordered to be in the appeal.

Court Disposition

Application allowed by consent; status quo maintained; stay of execution granted; costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • Status quo obtaining now be maintained pending the hearing and determination of Kisumu Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2015.
  • The respondent is restrained from selling, parting with possession, transferring or charging the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the said appeal.