[2017] KEELRC 1557 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1557 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was employed by the respondent on a six-month contract from November 2010 to April 2011, as evidenced by a stamped contract. The respondent's denial, based on the assertion that the claimant was a casual employee and that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1557 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Walter Nalanya; Respondent: Manager Elgon Villa Hotel
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 173 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed
Judges
DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Employment Contracts, Salary Arrears, Leave Entitlements, Overtime Pay, Casual Vs Term Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Employment Contracts Salary Arrears Leave Entitlements Overtime Pay Casual Vs Term Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Walter Nalanya

Claimant

Manager Elgon Villa Hotel

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was employed by the respondent on a six-month contract or as a casual employee.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to salary arrears, leave pay, overtime, and other terminal dues as claimed.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent's defence that the contract was a forgery is valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was employed by the respondent on a six-month contract from November 2010 to April 2011, as evidenced by a stamped contract. The respondent's denial, based on the assertion that the claimant was a casual employee and that the contract was a forgery, was unsupported by any evidence. The respondent's representative, having only taken over management in February 2011, could not credibly dispute the contract's authenticity. The court held that the claimant was entitled to the claimed sum of Kshs.32,760 for salary arrears, leave, and overtime, as well as reasonable reimbursements for court fees and...

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.32,760 as claimed for salary arrears, leave, and overtime.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.10,000 as reimbursement for court fees, service, and reasonable travelling expenses.