Mbadi v Pride Kings Security Services Ltd (Appeal E045 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3576 (KLR) (15 December 2025) (Judgment)

Mbadi v Pride Kings Security Services Ltd (Appeal E045 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3576 (KLR) (15 December 2025) (Judgment)

The appellant failed to adduce evidence to bring his resignation within the purview of constructive dismissal as defined in the cited authorities. There was no evidence of requests for leave or underpayment prior to termination, and the trial court's findings were upheld. The appeal was found devoid of merit and dismissed.

Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3576 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Walter Odoyo Mbadi; Respondent: Pride Kings Security Services Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
15 December 2025
Case Number
Appeal E045 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Termination, Terminal Dues, Underpayment, Continuing Injury, Statutory Entitlements
Source Language
English
Employment Law Labour Law Constructive Dismissal Unfair Termination Terminal Dues Underpayment Continuing Injury Statutory Entitlements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Walter Odoyo Mbadi

Appellant

Pride Kings Security Services Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was constructively dismissed or voluntarily resigned
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was entitled to terminal and contractual dues independently of unfair termination
  3. 3 Whether the appellant was entitled to compensation for unfair termination

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to adduce evidence to bring his resignation within the purview of constructive dismissal as defined in the cited authorities. There was no evidence of requests for leave or underpayment prior to termination, and the trial court's findings were upheld. The appeal was found devoid of merit and dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Each party will bear their own costs.