[2023] KEHC 25220 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 25220 (KLR)

The court found that the issues raised in the application, including the reconciliation of accounts and the determination of the true amount owed, are central to the substantive appeal and should be resolved at the hearing of the appeal rather than through interlocutory orders. The court noted that directions had...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 25220 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: John Wacira Wambugu; Respondent: Disciplinary Tribunal of Law Society Of Kenya; Respondent: Monica Wanjiku Ngugi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E020 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed; directions issued for expeditious prosecution of the appeal.
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Account Reconciliation, Injunctive Relief, Stay of Execution, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Account Reconciliation Injunctive Relief Stay of Execution Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Wacira Wambugu

Appellant

Disciplinary Tribunal of Law Society Of Kenya

Respondent

Monica Wanjiku Ngugi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court should order reconciliation of the 2nd respondent's accounts with the appellant's to determine the true position of payments and amounts owed pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the court should order supply of certified copies of the 2nd respondent's bank statements with the appellant.
  3. 3 Whether an injunction should be granted restraining the 2nd respondent from executing or recovering sums pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues raised in the application, including the reconciliation of accounts and the determination of the true amount owed, are central to the substantive appeal and should be resolved at the hearing of the appeal rather than through interlocutory orders. The court noted that directions had already been given for the prosecution of the appeal and that a stay of execution pending appeal had previously been granted. Accordingly, the court declined to grant the orders sought in the application and directed the appellant to file and serve the record of appeal within 30 days and to prosecute the appeal within 90 days, so that the issues could be determined with finality.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; directions issued for expeditious prosecution of the appeal.

Orders

  • Appellant to file and serve the record of appeal within 30 days.
  • Appellant granted 90 days to fully prosecute the appeal.