[2023] KEHC 25220 (KLR)
The court found that the issues raised in the application, including the reconciliation of accounts and the determination of the true amount owed, are central to the substantive appeal and should be resolved at the hearing of the appeal rather than through interlocutory orders. The court noted that directions had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 25220 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: John Wacira Wambugu; Respondent: Disciplinary Tribunal of Law Society Of Kenya; Respondent: Monica Wanjiku Ngugi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E020 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; directions issued for expeditious prosecution of the appeal.
- Judges
- AN Ongeri
- Legal Topics
- Account Reconciliation, Injunctive Relief, Stay of Execution, Appeals Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Wacira Wambugu
Appellant
Disciplinary Tribunal of Law Society Of Kenya
Respondent
Monica Wanjiku Ngugi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should order reconciliation of the 2nd respondent's accounts with the appellant's to determine the true position of payments and amounts owed pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the court should order supply of certified copies of the 2nd respondent's bank statements with the appellant.
- 3 Whether an injunction should be granted restraining the 2nd respondent from executing or recovering sums pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the issues raised in the application, including the reconciliation of accounts and the determination of the true amount owed, are central to the substantive appeal and should be resolved at the hearing of the appeal rather than through interlocutory orders. The court noted that directions had already been given for the prosecution of the appeal and that a stay of execution pending appeal had previously been granted. Accordingly, the court declined to grant the orders sought in the application and directed the appellant to file and serve the record of appeal within 30 days and to prosecute the appeal within 90 days, so that the issues could be determined with finality.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; directions issued for expeditious prosecution of the appeal.
Orders
- Appellant to file and serve the record of appeal within 30 days.
- Appellant granted 90 days to fully prosecute the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Wambugu v Disciplinary Tribunal of Law Society of Kenya & another (Civil Appeal E020 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 25220 (KLR) (Civ) (10 November 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 25220 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Civil
Civil Appeal E020 of 2021
AN Ongeri, J
November 10, 2023
Between
John Wacira Wambugu
Applicant
and
The Disciplinary Tribunal of Law Society Of Kenya
1st Respondent
Monica Wanjiku Ngugi
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. The application coming for consideration is the one dated February 24, 2023 seeking the following orders;i.This application be certified urgent and be dispensed with in the first instance.ii.This honourable court do issue an order of reconciliation of all the 2nd respondent’s accounts with the appellant’s including current accounts to scrutinize and discern the true position of the amount of money paid and money owed to the 2nd respondent by the appellant pending hearing and determination of the appeal.iii.This honourable court do issue an order of supply of certified copies of the bank statements of the 2nd respondent’s account with the appellant including current accounts.iv.Pending the hearing and determination of this suit, an order of injunction be granted restraining the 2nd respondent, whether acting by himself or through his agents, assigns or representatives from executing, proclaiming the appellant’s property or recovering any costs of sums owed to the respondent by the appellant.
2. It is based on the following grounds;i.That the 2nd respondent lodged a complaint against the appellant before the 1st respondent, resulting to Disciplinary Tribunal Cause No. 79 of 2013ii.That following discussions with the Chief Executive Officer of the Law Society of Kenya that aimed at assisting the 2nd respondent and the appellant to conduct a joint account reconciliation, it was agreed that the appellant deposit a sum of kshs.1,200,000/= before the accounts reconciliation was done.iii.That the appellant has since deposited the sum of kshs.1,200,000/= with the Law Society of Kenya in good faith to enable the parties conduct a smooth joint account reconciliation.iv.That the appellant have since deposited an extra amount of kshs.2,000,000/= to the Law Society of Keya to further comply with the court orders issued on 24th February 2021. v.That the amount of kshs.11,900,000/= is disputed since the deposits have not been acknowledged by the respondents.vi.That the parties are still yet to confirm this contentious figure owing to the reluctance, laxity and trepidation of the 2nd respondent to conduct the joint account reconciliation.vii.That the 2nd respondent has refused to acknowledge the sum of the remaining balance paid out by the appellant to the 2nd respondent directly.viii.That the 2nd respondent has denied the appellant an opportunity to reconcile the account, and determine the exact amount paid out by the appellant and the money owed, if any.ix.That the appellant is apprehensive that the 2nd respondent might go for execution.x.That if the court fails to issue a mandatory order instructing the parties to take the joint account reconciliation, the appellant shall be condemned unheard, over an amount of money that is in contention and has not been accounted for.xi.Finally, THAT the appellant herein is subject to substantial loss in the event that the 2nd respondent proceeds to institute execution proceedings.
3. The application is supported by the supporting affidavit of the applicant/appellant sworn on 24/2/2023.
4. The respondents filed a replying affidavit dated 15/3/2023 opposing the Appellant’s application.
5. The parties filed written submissions which I have duly considered.
6. The issues for determination are as follows;i.Whether this court should issue an order of reconciliation of all the 2nd respondent’s accounts with the appellant’s including current accounts to scrutinize and discern the true position of the amount of money paid and money owed to the 2nd respondent by the appellant pending hearing and determination of this appeal.ii.Whether this court should issue an order for supply of certified copies of the bank statements of the 2nd respondent’s account with the appellant including current accounts.iii.Whether an order of injunction should be granted restraining the 2nd respondent, whether acting by himself or through his agents, assigns or representatives from executing, proclaiming the appellant’s property or recovering any costs of sums owed to the respondent by the appellant pending the hearing and determination of this appeal
7. I find that the Application dated 24/02/2023 is seeking an order of reconciliation of all the 2nd respondent’s accounts with the appellant’s including current accounts to scrutinize and discern the true position of the amount of money paid and money owed to the 2nd respondent by the appellant pending hearing and determination of this appeal.
8. The Applicant is also seeking an order of injunction restraining the 2nd respondent, whether acting by himself or through his agents, assigns or representatives from executing, proclaiming the appellant’s property or recovering any costs of sums owed to the respondent by the appellant pending the hearing and determination of this appeal
9. Since this court gave directions on 30/6/2021, the parties should proceed with the appeal and the issues raised in this application be determined with finality.
10. I direct that the Appellant files and serves the record of appeal within 30 days of this date. The Appellant is granted 90 days to fully prosecute the appeal.
11. The court has already granted stay of execution pending appeal.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ONLINE VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT NAIROBI THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023. ...................A. N. ONGERIJUDGEIn the presence of:……………………………. for the Appellant……………………………. for the 1st Respondent……………………………. for the 2nd Respondent