[2025] KEHC 2017 (KLR)
The court found that the record did not indicate the period spent in remand custody was considered during sentencing. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory and requires the court to factor in any period spent in custody prior to sentencing. The applicant was in remand for 2 years, from 12th July...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 2017 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Mwangi Wambugu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E044 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Ruling on Sentence Computation
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- E Ominde
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Remand Custody Credit, Sexual Offences, Defilement, Criminal Procedure Code Section 333 2
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Mwangi Wambugu
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Ruling on Sentence Computation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period of 2 years spent in remand custody by the applicant should be factored into his 15-year sentence as required by Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the record did not indicate the period spent in remand custody was considered during sentencing. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory and requires the court to factor in any period spent in custody prior to sentencing. The applicant was in remand for 2 years, from 12th July 2019 to 15th July 2021. The court therefore allowed the application and directed that the 2 years spent in remand be computed as part of the applicant's 15-year sentence for defilement.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The period of 2 years spent in remand custody by the applicant shall be computed as part of his 15-year sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Wambugu v Republic (Criminal Petition E044 of 2021) [2025] KEHC 2017 (KLR) (20 February 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2017 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Eldoret
Criminal Petition E044 of 2021
E Ominde, J
February 20, 2025
Between
David Mwangi Wambugu
Petitioner
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Petitioner herein moved this Court by way of a Notice of Motion Court stamped as received by the Court on 22nd July 2021. He prays to Court that as provided under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Court considers and factors into his sentence the period of 2 years that he was in remand custody during the trial.
2. He states in the Affidavit in support of the Application that he was charged with the offence of Defilement contrary to Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act No 3 of 2006 Laws of Kenya, convicted and sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment. That he has no issue with the conviction and the sentence and has only one Ground of Appeal as above.
3. Counsel for the State in his oral response to this Application stated that for reasons that the cited provision of the law is mandatory and that if indeed the applicant was indeed in remand custody as he states then he concedes that the period of 2 years can be factored into the applicant’s 10-year sentence.
4. I have perused the record of proceedings of sentencing. It does not indicate that that the period that the applicant spent in remand was included in the 15 years imprisonment sentence. I agree with the prosecution that this provision is mandatory. The applicant took plea on 12th July 2019 and was sentenced on 15th July 2021 bringing the aggregate period to 2 years. In this regard, I allow the Application and direct the period of 2 years that the applicant spent in remand be computed in his sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment.
5. Right of Appeal 14 days
READ DATED AND SIGNED AT ELDORET ON 20TH FEBRUARY 2025. E. OMINDEJUDGE