[2003] KEHC 900 (KLR)
The court determined that before appointing a guardian ad litem for Wambui Kariuki, it must conduct a proper inquiry into her mental state as required by Order 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The application was brought under the wrong provision, but the court recognized its duty to protect individuals alleged to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] KEHC 900 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Wambui Kariuki; Defendant: Kamau Mwangi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 526 of 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem, Stay, and Review
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; protective orders granted; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- AI Hayanga
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem, Mental Incapacity, Review of Judgment, Stay of Execution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wambui Kariuki
Plaintiff
Kamau Mwangi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem, Stay, and Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be appointed guardian ad litem for Wambui Kariuki due to alleged insanity.
- 2 Whether a stay of the Deputy Registrar's orders and review of the judgment is warranted given the applicant's mental state.
- 3 Whether the application was brought under the correct legal provision and the court's duty to inquire into mental incapacity.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that before appointing a guardian ad litem for Wambui Kariuki, it must conduct a proper inquiry into her mental state as required by Order 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The application was brought under the wrong provision, but the court recognized its duty to protect individuals alleged to be of unsound mind. The court found itself not competent to retrospectively assess the applicant's mental state at the time of the transaction but directed that an application be made under the Mental Health Act for her committal to a mental institution. Pending such application and further orders, the court stayed all dealings with the applicant's property and the proceedings....
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; protective orders granted; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The person alleged to be suffering from mental disorder shall be committed to a mental institution upon application under Section 28(1) of the Mental Health Act, Cap 248.
- No one shall deal in any way to dispose of or acquire any rights over the applicant's property until further orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 526 OF 1993
WAMBUI KARIUKI …………………………………………….PLAINTIFF
V E R S U S
KAMAU MWANGI……………………………………………DEFENDNAT
R U L I N G
By Chamber Summons of 20. 5.2003 the Applicant is applying to be appointed guardian ad litem on behalf of Wambui Kariuki who is said to have become insane; a stay order against orders of Deputy Registrar of 28. 3.2003 and that judgement delivered by Hon. Rawal J., on 19. 12. 2000 be reviewed.
The application is opposed by the Respondent who says that the transaction affecting the suit premises was concluded long before the alleged mental incapacity.
This application is brought under the wrong provision. It should be under Order 31 of Civil Procedure Rules Cap 21. That rule commands the court to carry out initial enquiries to ascertain whether the person is of unsound mind or suffers from mental infirmity rendering her/him incapable of protecting her/his interest. It is said that the Court thus acts in the position of locus parenti to people who become mad. The Court must inquire and where the Court appoints a guardian ad litem, without proper inquiry, the decree passed against Defendant will be set aside.
Miss Kinuthia in opposing says the transfer was already registered before the alleged mental incapacity and that the lower Court dismissed a similar application but it must be noted that in mental incapacity case, res judicata does not apply on a contract with a mad person is void and although in this case the Court can investigate, I do not think the Court is competent to form opinion on the mental condition of the sick person as to her mental state years back when the contract was concluded.
I direct therefore, that the person suffering from mental disorder be committed to a mental institution after an application filed in this Court for orders under Section 28(1) of the Mental Health Act Cap 248. Meanwhile, I order that no one should deal in any way as to dispose of or acquire any rights over her property. The issues in this case will remain stayed until further orders. Application under this Act be made in two (2) weeks and this case be mentioned on 20. 6.2003.
Application is allowed to that extent.
No order as to costs.
DATED this 29th day of May 2003
A.I. HAYANGA
JUDGE
Read to -
Miss Kinuthia
And Mr. Osangi