[2025] KECA 1274 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal on the severity of sentence, as this is a matter of fact and not law under section 361(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant's intended appeal concerns only the sentence imposed after resentencing and subsequent revision applications, not the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECA 1274 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Fred Wafula Waminila; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E009 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Judges
- DK Musinga
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Second Appeals, Sentence Review, Jurisdiction of Court
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fred Wafula Waminila
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal out of time on matters concerning severity of sentence.
- 2 Whether the applicant's intended appeal raises a matter of law or fact.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal on the severity of sentence, as this is a matter of fact and not law under section 361(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant's intended appeal concerns only the sentence imposed after resentencing and subsequent revision applications, not the conviction. Since the law expressly bars the Court from hearing appeals on severity of sentence except in limited circumstances not applicable here, the application for leave to appeal out of time is without merit and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- The application for leave to file an appeal out of time is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Waminila v Republic (Criminal Application E009 of 2024) [2025] KECA 1274 (KLR) (11 July 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECA 1274 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Criminal Application E009 of 2024
DK Musinga, JA
July 11, 2025
Between
Fred Wafula Waminila
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an application for leave to file an appeal out of time from the Ruling of the High Court of Kenya (Kimondo, J.) delivered on 13th July 2023 in Misc. Criminal Application No. E240 of 2022)
Ruling
1. On 17th January 1996 the applicants were convicted of robbery with violence and sentenced to death in accordance with the prevailing law then. In 2009, all death sentences were commuted to life imprisonment through a presidential decree.
2. Being dissatisfied with their conviction and sentence they preferred an appeal to the High Court, which dismissed the appeal on 25th March 2014.
3. Undeterred, the applicants preferred a second appeal to this Court, but on 21st January 2020 they withdrew it so that they could pursue resentencing at the trial court pursuant to the jurisprudence that had emerged from the Supreme Court’s judgment in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs Republic [2017] eKLR.
4. The applicants’ resentencing application was determined on 25th March 2021. The trial magistrate held, inter alia:“…looking at the probation officer’s report and mitigation and aggravating factors and giving credit to time served, I hereby set aside the life sentence imposed against applicants. I therefore resentence the applicants to 70 years’ imprisonment commencing the date of sentence before the trial court on 17/01/1996. Right of appeal explained.”
5. Thereafter the applicants filed a Revision application before the High Court, which was dismissed on 5th May 2022. They instituted yet another Revision application before the High Court, which was similarly dismissed on 13th July 2023.
6. On 30th January 2024 the applicants filed an application under section 361 of the Criminal Procedure Code and rule 70(3) of this Court’s Rules seeking leave to file an appeal out of time. Section 361(1) states as follows:“Second appeals1. A party to an appeal from a subordinate court may, subject to subsection (8) , appeal against a decision of the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction on a matter of law, and the Court of Appeal shall not hear an appeal under this section—a.on a matter of fact, and severity of sentence is a matter of fact; orb.against sentence, except where a sentence has been enhanced by the High Court, unless the subordinate court had no power under section 7 to pass that sentence.”
7. Whereas under section 341 of the Criminal Procedure Code the Court to which an appeal is made may for good cause admit an appeal after the period of fourteen days has elapsed, section 361(1) is explicit that this Court shall not hear an appeal regarding severity of sentence, which is a matter of fact. The applicants’ Revision application was in respect of sentence, not conviction.
8. This application is therefore devoid of merit and I dismiss it.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2025. D. K. MUSINGA (PRESIDENT)...........................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the original.SignedDEPUTY REGISTRAR.