[2024] KEELC 5402 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 5402 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant provided a satisfactory explanation for the non-attendance on 27th July 2023. The judge was satisfied that the reasons advanced in the supporting affidavit were credible and that reinstating the application would not prejudice the respondent. Exercising its discretion under Order...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 5402 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Stanley KM Wandaka t/a Kinuthia Wandaka & Co Advocates; Respondent: Naomi Kanyua Musyoki
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case 10 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Suit, Dismissal for Non Attendance, Exercise of Discretion, Costs of Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Reinstatement of Suit Dismissal for Non Attendance Exercise of Discretion Costs of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stanley KM Wandaka t/a Kinuthia Wandaka & Co Advocates

Applicant

Naomi Kanyua Musyoki

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement

  1. 1 Whether the application for reinstatement of the suit is merited.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has provided a satisfactory explanation for non-attendance.
  3. 3 Whether reinstatement would prejudice the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant provided a satisfactory explanation for the non-attendance on 27th July 2023. The judge was satisfied that the reasons advanced in the supporting affidavit were credible and that reinstating the application would not prejudice the respondent. Exercising its discretion under Order 12 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules and guided by the overriding objectives of the Civil Procedure Act, the court allowed the application for reinstatement. The costs of the application were ordered to be borne by the applicant.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The application dated 18th April 2023 and/or the suit is reinstated.
  • The costs of the application are to be borne by the applicant.