[2024] KEELC 5957 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 5957 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had been in exclusive, open, peaceful, and uninterrupted possession of the suit property since 2010, carrying out agricultural activities and making improvements such as fencing, building a shed, and planting crops and trees. The defendant, despite being served by substituted...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 5957 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mathew Kinyua Wangai; Defendant: Priscilla Wambui Mwangi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E01 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Outcome
plaintiff's claim allowed
Judges
JO Olola
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Limitation of Actions, Title Registration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Adverse Possession Limitation of Actions Title Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mathew Kinyua Wangai

Plaintiff

Priscilla Wambui Mwangi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has acquired title to Naromoru/Block 1/Ragati/T.595 by adverse possession.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to be registered as proprietor of the suit land in place of the defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had been in exclusive, open, peaceful, and uninterrupted possession of the suit property since 2010, carrying out agricultural activities and making improvements such as fencing, building a shed, and planting crops and trees. The defendant, despite being served by substituted service, did not contest the claim or present any evidence to the contrary. The plaintiff's evidence was therefore unchallenged. The court applied the principles of adverse possession as set out in the Limitation of Actions Act and relevant case law, finding that the plaintiff's possession met the requirements of being open, continuous, and adverse to the interests of the registered...

Court Disposition

plaintiff's claim allowed

Orders

  • A declaration is made that the plaintiff has acquired title by adverse possession to Naromoru/Block 1/Ragati/T.595.
  • The parcel of land known as Naromoru/Block 1/Ragati/T.595 shall be forthwith registered in the name of the plaintiff and the title issued in the defendant's name is cancelled.