Wangari & another v Muchiri (Civil Appeal E286 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 5854 (KLR) (30 April 2026) (Ruling)
Applicants failed to demonstrate substantial loss, did not offer security, and grounds of appeal do not raise arguable points of law. Application for stay of execution pending appeal does not meet the threshold under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 5854 (KLR)
- Parties
- 1st Appellant/applicant: Rahab Wangari; 2nd Appellant/applicant: Tranguin Trevor Kanyi Ndirangu; Respondent: Margaret Wambui Muchiri
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2026
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E286 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeals, Default Judgment, Security for Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rahab Wangari
1st Appellant/applicant
Tranguin Trevor Kanyi Ndirangu
2nd Appellant/applicant
Margaret Wambui Muchiri
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have satisfied the conditions for stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants failed to demonstrate substantial loss, did not offer security, and grounds of appeal do not raise arguable points of law. Application for stay of execution pending appeal does not meet the threshold under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- application dated and amended on 27th November 2025 dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment