[2017] KEHC 9057 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 9057 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant delayed in presenting his application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings, as the gazettement of candidates for the General Elections had already taken place. The statutory timelines for challenging such decisions are strict in electoral matters, and the relief...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 9057 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Wangari Jackson Muturi; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Appeal 410 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Ruling on Application for Leave to Institute Judicial Review Proceedings
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
LK Kimaru
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Election Nominations, Time Barred Applications
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Election Petitions Judicial Review Election Nominations Time Barred Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wangari Jackson Muturi

Applicant

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Ruling on Application for Leave to Institute Judicial Review Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to leave to institute judicial review proceedings to quash the respondent's decision.
  2. 2 Whether the application was filed within the required time limits for judicial review.
  3. 3 Whether the gazettement of candidates rendered the application futile.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant delayed in presenting his application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings, as the gazettement of candidates for the General Elections had already taken place. The statutory timelines for challenging such decisions are strict in electoral matters, and the relief sought could not be granted after the gazettement. Granting leave would be futile since the administrative act sought to be quashed was already finalized and could not be undone. Therefore, the application was dismissed for being time barred and for lack of utility.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings is dismissed.
  • There shall be no order as to costs.