[2013] KEHC 3638 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 3638 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the registered owner of the suit parcels Bungoma/Kabuyefwe/687 and 688, as evidenced by the title deeds and green card. The defendants, having failed to appear or contest the claim, left the plaintiff's evidence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 3638 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Wanjala Joram Mukongolo; Defendant: Waswa Daniel Mukongolo; Defendant: Delphas Kibaya Adenya Chigabi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 114 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim allowed; eviction order and permanent injunction granted.
Judges
AA Omollo
Legal Topics
Eviction Orders, Permanent Injunctions, Title Registration, Land Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Eviction Orders Permanent Injunctions Title Registration Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wanjala Joram Mukongolo

Plaintiff

Waswa Daniel Mukongolo

Defendant

Delphas Kibaya Adenya Chigabi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the lawful owner of land parcels Bungoma/Kabuyefwe/687 and 688.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants unlawfully occupied or interfered with the plaintiff's land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to eviction orders and a permanent injunction against the defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the registered owner of the suit parcels Bungoma/Kabuyefwe/687 and 688, as evidenced by the title deeds and green card. The defendants, having failed to appear or contest the claim, left the plaintiff's evidence unchallenged. The court accepted the plaintiff's account that the 1st defendant, his uncle, had previously held the land and sold one parcel to the 2nd defendant, but that the plaintiff subsequently obtained lawful title through a vesting order. There was no evidence to the contrary. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to eviction orders and a permanent injunction to protect...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim allowed; eviction order and permanent injunction granted.

Orders

  • Eviction order issued against both defendants from land parcels Bungoma/Kabuyefwe/687 and 688.
  • Defendants to vacate the land within 60 days from service of the order.