[2007] KEHC 1539 (KLR)
The court found that justice would best be served by granting the application to reinstate the appeal. The judge emphasized the importance of exercising judicial discretion to ensure justice between the parties, referencing established authority that the court should not impose unnecessary restrictions on its...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 1539 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Wanjau Mwangi; Respondent: Flora Wanjiku
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 10 of 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Reinstatement of Appeal After Dismissal for Non Attendance
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Dismissal order set aside. Appeal reinstated for hearing. Costs of the application awarded to the respondent.
- Judges
- MM Kasango, MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Reinstatement of Appeal, Dismissal for Non Attendance, Exercise of Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wanjau Mwangi
Appellant
Flora Wanjiku
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Reinstatement of Appeal After Dismissal for Non Attendance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be reinstated after dismissal for non-attendance by the appellant's counsel.
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion in favour of the appellant to set aside the dismissal order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that justice would best be served by granting the application to reinstate the appeal. The judge emphasized the importance of exercising judicial discretion to ensure justice between the parties, referencing established authority that the court should not impose unnecessary restrictions on its discretion. The appellant's explanation for non-attendance and subsequent actions were considered sufficient to justify setting aside the dismissal. The court therefore set aside the dismissal order and reinstated the appeal for hearing, awarding costs of the application to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Dismissal order set aside. Appeal reinstated for hearing. Costs of the application awarded to the respondent.
Orders
- The dismissal of the appeal dated 17th May 2007 is set aside.
- The appeal is re-admitted for hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
Civil Appeal 10 of 2000
WANJAU MWANGI………………………..…..……………….………APPELLANT
Versus
FLORA WANJIKU..……………………………....…………………RESPONDENT
(Being appeal against the judgment delivered on 17th November 1999 in Civil Case Number 47 of 1993 Kangema by Abdul El Kindly Senior Resident Magistrate)
RULING
The present application is by Notice of Motion dated 26th June 2007. It seeks a prayer that this court be pleased to re-admit this appeal for hearing. On 17th May 2007 when the appeal came up for hearing, the Appellant’ counsel being absent, the appeal was dismissed for non attendance. The Appellant states that he was in court on the material day but did not know what to do when the matter was called out. On the appeal being dismissed he attended to his then advocate’s office and those advocates later refused to continue to represent him in this matter. He therefore seeks that the appeal be re-admitted. The Respondent in the appeal opposes the application. She states that she is in possession of LOC. 19/NYAKIANGA/1857 which is curved out of the suit property. That the Appellant took 45 days from the dismissal to file the present application.
I have considered the Appellant’s application and the Respondent’s opposition and the arguments of counsel. By making the present application the Appellant seeks this court to exercise its discretion in his favour. When the Court is called upon to exercise its discretion it is worthwhile to remember the words of the case of PATEL V E.A. CARGO HANDLING SERVICES [1974] E.A. 75 at pg 76 where Sir William Duffus P said:
“The main concern of the court is to do justice to the parties, and a court will not impose conditions on itself to fetter the wide discretion given it by the rules”.
Accordingly I find that the justice of this case is best served by granting the order sought. Accordingly the order of this court is that the dismissal of this appeal of 17th May 2007 be and is hereby set aside and the appeal is re-admitted for hearing. The costs of the Notice of Motion dated 26th June 2007 are awarded to the Respondent.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 14th day of November 2007.
By: M. S. A. MAKHANDIA
JUDGE