[2022] KEHC 13046 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 13046 (KLR)

The court found that the application was incompetent because the prayers sought by the appellant for stay of execution and stay of proceedings related to cases (Kiambu CMCC No 71 of 2019 and Kiambu CMCC No 352 of 2021) that were not the subject of the present appeal, which was against Kiambu Chief Magistrate’s Court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 13046 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Francis Machira Wanjau; Respondent: Esther Wanjiku Wanjiru (Suing as the legal representative of the estate of Liam Mbugua (deceased))
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E131 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeals Process, Competency of Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Appeals Process Competency of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Machira Wanjau

Appellant

Esther Wanjiku Wanjiru (Suing as the legal representative of the estate of Liam Mbugua (deceased))

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution relates to the correct case under appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application is competent for failing to seek stay of execution in the relevant case.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application was incompetent because the prayers sought by the appellant for stay of execution and stay of proceedings related to cases (Kiambu CMCC No 71 of 2019 and Kiambu CMCC No 352 of 2021) that were not the subject of the present appeal, which was against Kiambu Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No 91 of 2019. As such, the application failed to seek stay of execution in the relevant case and had no relationship to the appeal before the court. The court therefore dismissed the application with costs and vacated the interim stay previously granted.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The notice of motion dated October 1, 2021 is dismissed with costs.
  • The interim stay granted on October 7, 2021 is vacated.