[2021] KECA 257 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 257 (KLR)

The court found that while the applicant explained the initial delay in filing the notice of appeal due to lack of notice of judgment and the need to instruct new counsel, she failed to satisfactorily explain the subsequent four-month delay before filing the present application for extension of time. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECA 257 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Daina Wambui Wanjiku; Respondent: Eunice Wangu Githuka; Respondent: Charles Munyiri Gachigua
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 138 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
SG Kairu
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Innocent Purchaser, Notice of Judgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Appeals Process Innocent Purchaser Notice of Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daina Wambui Wanjiku

Applicant

Eunice Wangu Githuka

Respondent

Charles Munyiri Gachigua

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing and serving the notice of appeal and record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay between the discovery of the judgment and the filing of the present application is excusable under the applicable legal principles.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the applicant explained the initial delay in filing the notice of appeal due to lack of notice of judgment and the need to instruct new counsel, she failed to satisfactorily explain the subsequent four-month delay before filing the present application for extension of time. The justification offered—waiting for typed proceedings and a certificate of delay—was deemed insufficient, as these were not prerequisites for filing the application. Nevertheless, considering the nature of the matter and the proposed grounds of appeal, the court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicant, allowing the application for extension of time, but noted its reluctance due...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The application dated 23rd August 2019 is allowed.
  • Time for filing and serving the notice of appeal and memorandum and record of appeal is extended.