https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kecopt/2026/237

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kecopt/2026/237

The Tribunal found it undisputed that the Claimant was a member and had deposits of Kshs. 486,610.16 against a loan of Kshs. 175,981.00, leaving a net amount due of Kshs. 368,129.00. The Respondent's reliance on an unspecified refund-suspension resolution was insufficient because its time frame and continuing...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KECOPT 237 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Susan Wanjiku; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Ltd
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E594 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Cooperative Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment entered partly for the Claimant.
Judges
["J Mwatsama", "B Sawe", "F Lotuiya", "M Chesikaw", "PO Aol"]
Legal Topics
Member Savings Refund, Loan Offset Upon Withdrawal, Dividends Claim, SACCO AGM Resolutions, Proof of Entitlement
Source Language
en
Co Operative Law Employment Related SACCO Dispute Civil Procedure Member Savings Refund Loan Offset Upon Withdrawal Dividends Claim SACCO AGM Resolutions Proof of Entitlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Susan Wanjiku

Claimant

Metropolitan National Sacco Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cooperative Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent owed the Claimant the net balance of her deposits after offsetting the loan facility.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent could rely on an AGM resolution suspending refunds to defeat the Claimant's claim.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant proved entitlement to unpaid dividends.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found it undisputed that the Claimant was a member and had deposits of Kshs. 486,610.16 against a loan of Kshs. 175,981.00, leaving a net amount due of Kshs. 368,129.00. The Respondent's reliance on an unspecified refund-suspension resolution was insufficient because its time frame and continuing validity were not shown. The Tribunal therefore entered judgment for the Claimant on the refund claim, but dismissed the dividends claim for want of proof.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered partly for the Claimant.

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs. 368,129.00.
  • The Claimant is awarded costs.