[2025] KECPT 329 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 329 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the claimant had sufficiently proved her membership in the respondent Sacco through documentary evidence, including payslips and a withdrawal letter. The respondent did not effectively dispute her membership or the amount claimed. The Tribunal held that the respondent's internal resolution...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 329 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ndungu Josphine Wanjiku; Respondent: Metropolitan Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 925/E1035 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed in full.
Judges
Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Refunds, Withdrawal of Membership, Contractual Obligations, Share Capital Repayment
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Sacco Member Refunds Withdrawal of Membership Contractual Obligations Share Capital Repayment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ndungu Josphine Wanjiku

Applicant

Metropolitan Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is a member of the respondent Sacco.
  2. 2 Whether any monies are due to the claimant and, if so, how much.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant had sufficiently proved her membership in the respondent Sacco through documentary evidence, including payslips and a withdrawal letter. The respondent did not effectively dispute her membership or the amount claimed. The Tribunal held that the respondent's internal resolution suspending refunds, lacking clarity on duration and justification, could not override the claimant's statutory right to a refund. Financial challenges faced by the Sacco do not absolve it from its obligation to refund a withdrawing member's shares. Accordingly, the Tribunal found in favour of the claimant for the full amount claimed, plus costs and interest.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in full.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs 315,000.
  • Respondent to pay costs of the suit and interest until payment in full.