[2015] KEHC 1091 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1091 (KLR)

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to title to land after the establishment and operationalization of the Environment and Land Court. The suit was instituted after the transitional period provided for by the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act, and therefore,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 1091 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Wanjiru Kangethe; Defendant: Ann Wairimu Ndungu; Defendant: National Land Commission
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 491 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Suit struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Court, Cancellation of Title, Fraudulent Land Transfer
Source Language
en
Land and Property Jurisdiction of Court Cancellation of Title Fraudulent Land Transfer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wanjiru Kangethe

Plaintiff

Ann Wairimu Ndungu

Defendant

National Land Commission

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to title to land after the establishment of the Environment and Land Court.
  2. 2 Whether the suit was properly instituted in the High Court or should have been filed in the Environment and Land Court.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to cancellation of title for alleged fraudulent transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to title to land after the establishment and operationalization of the Environment and Land Court. The suit was instituted after the transitional period provided for by the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act, and therefore, the High Court is expressly barred from entertaining such matters. The proper forum for the plaintiff's claim for cancellation of title due to alleged fraud is the Environment and Land Court. As a result, the suit must be struck out for want of jurisdiction, but the plaintiff is not barred from instituting a fresh suit before a court of competent jurisdiction, subject to the law...

Court Disposition

Suit struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The suit is struck out for want of jurisdiction.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.