[2019] KEHC 2545 (KLR)
The court found that the appeal had already been dismissed on 16th June, 2015 for want of prosecution, and there was no evidence that the application for reinstatement was ever heard or that the dismissal order was set aside. The explanation for delay was insufficient, and the record did not show any active steps...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 2545 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Wanjiru Ndugo; Respondent: Mwangi Ngure
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 492 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Appeal found to be non-existent; no appeal presently before the court.
- Judges
- LM Njuguna
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Reinstatement of Appeal, Delay in Prosecution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wanjiru Ndugo
Appellant
Mwangi Ngure
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to prolonged inactivity.
- 2 Whether the application for reinstatement of the appeal was ever heard or the dismissal order set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appeal had already been dismissed on 16th June, 2015 for want of prosecution, and there was no evidence that the application for reinstatement was ever heard or that the dismissal order was set aside. The explanation for delay was insufficient, and the record did not show any active steps taken to revive the appeal. Therefore, as a matter of law and fact, there was no appeal pending before the court.
Court Disposition
Appeal found to be non-existent; no appeal presently before the court.
Orders
- There is no appeal presently before this court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 492 OF 2006
WANJIRU NDUGO.........................................................................APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
MWANGI NGURE........................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This ruling relates to the notice to show cause issued on 27th June, 2019 requiring the parties to show cause as to why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. The notice to show cause indicates that the appeal was last in court on 11th May, 2016.
2. In responding to the notice to show cause, Dominic Njuguna Mbigi swore the replying affidavit on 2nd October, 2019 on behalf of the appellant, asserting that the appellant disappeared soon after giving instructions to file the appeal, hence the reason why the appeal was never set down for hearing. The deponent stated that the appellant has since resurfaced and is still keen on prosecuting her appeal.
3. I have considered the explanation given by the advocate for the appellant in his affidavit referenced hereinabove. I have also perused the record and established that the memorandum of appeal was filed way back in July, 2006. Subsequently, the appellant filed her record of appeal on 28th March, 2007.
4. The record also shows that a notice to show cause had previously been issued against the parties and when the same came up for hearing on 16th June, 2015 neither the appellant nor the respondent were in attendance, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal on the said date.
5. Going by the record, the appellant through her advocates thereafter filed an application on 25th January, 2016 seeking the reinstatement of her appeal. Being guided by the record, I am able to determine that when the parties appeared before the court on 20th March, 2017, the counsel for the respondent indicated that his client passed away sometime in 2016; consequently, the matter was scheduled for mention on 11th May, 2017. However, there is no indication as to what transpired on the day the matter was scheduled for mention. From the foregoing, I have gathered that this is quite an old appeal which was in actual fact dismissed on 16th June, 2015 and there is nothing to indicate that the application dated 25th January, 2015 seeking to reinstate the appeal was ever heard and/or the dismissal order set aside.
6. In the premises, I find that as it stands, there is no appeal presently before this court.
Dated, signed and delivered at NAIROBI this 14th day of October, 2019
...........................
L. NJUGUNA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
......................................for the Appellant
....................................for the Respondent