[2013] KEELRC 473 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 473 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent failed to justify the termination of the claimant's employment and did not follow the statutory procedure required under the Employment Act 2007. The respondent's absence from the hearing and lack of credible evidence to support its allegations against the claimant led the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEELRC 473 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Wanjiru Thimba; Respondent: Placid View Properties Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 433 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Final Award
Outcome
Claim allowed in part; termination declared unfair; compensation and arrears awarded.
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Employment Contracts, Remedies for Wrongful Dismissal, Statutory Procedure, Compensation Calculation
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Employment Contracts Remedies for Wrongful Dismissal Statutory Procedure Compensation Calculation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wanjiru Thimba

Claimant

Placid View Properties Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Final Award

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the claimant's employment was unfair and unlawful.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation and arrears as claimed.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent followed the statutory procedure for termination under the Employment Act 2007.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to justify the termination of the claimant's employment and did not follow the statutory procedure required under the Employment Act 2007. The respondent's absence from the hearing and lack of credible evidence to support its allegations against the claimant led the court to accept the claimant's unchallenged evidence. The court held that the respondent's financial difficulties and subsequent actions, including deferring salaries and importing a management company, did not justify the creation of employment offences or the summary termination of the claimant. The court concluded that the termination was unfair and unlawful, entitling the claimant...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part; termination declared unfair; compensation and arrears awarded.

Orders

  • Termination was unfair.
  • Respondent to pay claimant arrears of salary, allowances, notice, and leave totaling Kshs.872,846.15.