[2024] KEELC 6419 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 6419 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's Notice of Motion was not accompanied by a supporting affidavit, which is a mandatory requirement under Order 51 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The absence of a supporting affidavit rendered the application incompetent, as it lacked the evidentiary basis required for the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 6419 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Stephen Mbugua Wanjiru; Respondent: Kiambu County Goverment; Respondent: County Government of Kiambu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Thika
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Petition E007 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Application
Outcome
application struck out for want of supporting affidavit
Judges
JG Kemei
Legal Topics
Supporting Affidavit Requirement, Conservatory Orders, Public Participation, County Legislation Challenge, Valuation and Rating, Procedural Incompetence
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Land and Property Supporting Affidavit Requirement Conservatory Orders Public Participation County Legislation Challenge Valuation and Rating +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Mbugua Wanjiru

Applicant

Kiambu County Goverment

Respondent

County Government of Kiambu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Application

  1. 1 Whether the Notice of Motion application is competent in the absence of a supporting affidavit.
  2. 2 Whether the court should grant conservatory orders suspending the Kiambu County Valuation and Rating Act, 2016.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondents should be compelled to provide information on public participation regarding the impugned legislation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's Notice of Motion was not accompanied by a supporting affidavit, which is a mandatory requirement under Order 51 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The absence of a supporting affidavit rendered the application incompetent, as it lacked the evidentiary basis required for the court to consider the reliefs sought. The court relied on established precedent that such a defect is not a mere technicality but a substantive flaw that cannot be cured. Consequently, the application was struck out for want of a supporting affidavit, and no orders as to costs were made.

Court Disposition

application struck out for want of supporting affidavit

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion application dated 19/4/2024 is struck out for want of a supporting affidavit.
  • No orders as to costs.