[2025] KECPT 247 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 247 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had properly withdrawn from the Respondent Sacco by issuing a handwritten letter dated 6th May 2021, and the Respondent failed to demonstrate the existence of a standard notice format or any outstanding liabilities on the part of the Claimant. The Tribunal held that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 247 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hannah Njiiru Wanjiru; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 660/E881 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Refunds, Share Contribution Disputes, Notice of Withdrawal, Cooperative Societies Act Compliance
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Sacco Member Refunds Share Contribution Disputes Notice of Withdrawal Cooperative Societies Act Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hannah Njiiru Wanjiru

Applicant

Metropolitan National Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of her share contributions upon resignation from the Sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant followed the proper procedure for withdrawal and notice under the relevant laws and by-laws.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent's financial difficulties and AGM resolutions can lawfully suspend or delay the Claimant's right to a refund.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had properly withdrawn from the Respondent Sacco by issuing a handwritten letter dated 6th May 2021, and the Respondent failed to demonstrate the existence of a standard notice format or any outstanding liabilities on the part of the Claimant. The Tribunal held that the Claimant's notice constituted a valid request for withdrawal and refund. The Respondent's reliance on AGM resolutions to suspend refunds was found insufficient to override statutory obligations under the Sacco Societies Act, which mandates refund of deposits within sixty days of notice. The Tribunal was satisfied that the Claimant's savings amounted to Kshs. 534,704.38, as evidenced by...

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the Claimant for Kshs. 534,704.38.
  • The Respondent shall pay interest at Tribunal rates from the date of filing the claim until payment in full.