[2025] KEBPRT 303 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the landlord issued contradictory and unsupported figures for rent arrears, ranging from Kshs.200,000/- to Kshs.6,950,000/-, without maintaining a proper rent book as required by law. The notice of termination was based on arrears insufficient to meet the statutory threshold for lawful termination under Section 7(1)(b) of Cap. 301, rendering it invalid. The Tribunal held that any levy of distress for rent must be preceded by a proper reconciliation of accounts and confirmation of actual arrears. The Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay Kshs.1,450,000/- for arrears between October 2024 and May 2025 within 30 days, failing which distress may issue for that sum only....
- Citation
- [2025] KEBPRT 303 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Gabriel Oduori Wanyama; Respondent: Patrick Njiru Kuria; Respondent: Great Mwanzo Properties; Respondent: Icon Auctioneers
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2025
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case E072 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Restraining Orders and Rent Dispute
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; tenant granted quiet possession; partial payment of arrears ordered; distress limited to specified arrears; costs to abide reference outcome.
- Judges
- N Wahome, Joyce Murigi
- Legal Topics
- Controlled Tenancy, Distress for Rent, Termination of Tenancy, Rent Arrears, Quiet Possession
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gabriel Oduori Wanyama
Applicant
Patrick Njiru Kuria
Respondent
Great Mwanzo Properties
Respondent
Icon Auctioneers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Restraining Orders and Rent Dispute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tenant's application for restraining orders against the landlord has merit.
- 2 Whether the landlord's notice of termination is lawful under the Act.
- 3 Whether the landlord is entitled to levy distress for alleged rent arrears.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the landlord issued contradictory and unsupported figures for rent arrears, ranging from Kshs.200,000/- to Kshs.6,950,000/-, without maintaining a proper rent book as required by law. The notice of termination was based on arrears insufficient to meet the statutory threshold for lawful termination under Section 7(1)(b) of Cap. 301, rendering it invalid. The Tribunal held that any levy of distress for rent must be preceded by a proper reconciliation of accounts and confirmation of actual arrears. The Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay Kshs.1,450,000/- for arrears between October 2024 and May 2025 within 30 days, failing which distress may issue for that sum only....
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; tenant granted quiet possession; partial payment of arrears ordered; distress limited to specified arrears; costs to abide reference outcome.
Orders
- The tenant shall have quiet possession of the premises pending determination of the reference.
- The tenant shall pay Kshs.1,450,000/- for arrears between October 2024 and May 2025 within 30 days; in default, distress may issue for that sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment