[2019] KEELC 2280 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the legitimate owner of the disputed one acre of land in plot number 217 at Basale Farm. The plaintiff's evidence, including share certificates and documentation of subdivision and sale, was unchallenged due to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 2280 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Wanyonyi Chekerie; Defendant: John Masai
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Land Case 80 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Ownership Disputes, Trespass, Injunctions, Mesne Profits
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wanyonyi Chekerie
Plaintiff
John Masai
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is the legitimate owner of one acre out of plot number 217 at Basale Farm.
- 2 Whether the defendant trespassed onto the plaintiff's land and unlawfully deprived him of possession.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the land.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the legitimate owner of the disputed one acre of land in plot number 217 at Basale Farm. The plaintiff's evidence, including share certificates and documentation of subdivision and sale, was unchallenged due to the defendant's failure to appear or defend the suit. The court accepted the plaintiff's account that the defendant had trespassed onto the retained acre and deprived him of its use. Although the plaintiff claimed Kshs. 60,000 in lost profits, the court awarded Kshs. 50,000 as reasonable nominal damages for mesne profits, given the absence of an actuarial report. The court granted a...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Orders
- A declaration that the plaintiff is the owner of one acre out of the two acres occupied by the defendant in plot number 217 at Basale Farm.
- A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his agents, and employees from cultivating, utilizing, trespassing upon, or dealing in any manner with the one acre portion of land number 217 at Basale Farm that the plaintiff did not sell to him.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KITALE
LAND CASE NO. 80 OF 2017
WANYONYI CHEKERIE....................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JOHN MASAI....................................DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
The Plaintiff’s Case
1. By a plaint dated 21/4/2017 and filed in court on 25/4/2017the plaintiff sought the following orders against the defendant:-
(a) A declaration that the plaintiff is the legitimate owner of the one acre out of plot number 217 and a permanent injunction to be issued restraining the defendant by himself through his agents and or employees from stepping onto, cultivating, using trespassing onto and or dealing with that parcel of land no 217 being one (1) acre in the larger Basale Farm.
(b) Costs of this suit
(c) Any other relief court may deem fit to grant.
2. According to the plaint the plaintiff was the first allottee and beneficiary of a parcel of land measuring 3 acres by virtue of his shareholding in Basale Farmers Cooperative Society. In 2006 he subdivided the land into three portions of one acre each. He transferred one to one John Kundu Wepukhulu and one acre to the defendant. He retained one acre for himself. However the defendant trespassed onto that remaining one acre and started farming on it in 2016, thus denying the plaintiff user thereof and occasioning him loss to the tune of Ksh 50,000/= hence this suit.
3. The affidavit of George Mumali filed in this record on 9/6/2017 shows that the defendant was served with plaint and summons but he did not file any appearance or defence to the suit. This prompted the application for judgment dated 13/12/2017 filed on 14/12/2017 whereupon this matter was listed for formal proof. Hearing proceeded on 9/5/2019 when the plaintiff testified alone in his case.
4. In his evidence-in-chief, the plaintiff reiterated the matters in the plaint, which were not denied by the defendant, and produced a share certificate that showed he was a member of the Basale Farmers Cooperative Society; he also produced the original agreement vide which he sold one acre to another purchaser he referred to as John Kundu. No agreement showing the size of the land sold to the defendant was produced but various letters from the Chief’s office were tendered as evidence of the dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant over one acre of land. However the defendant did not oppose the plaintiff’s claim and I find that the plaintiff deserves the declaration sought.
5. The defendant is said to be still farming on the suit land. The plaintiff’s evidence was that he would have produced at least 30 bags of maize and that each would have gone for Kshs. 3,000/= in the market. He claimed Kshs. 60,000/=.Considering the absence of an actuarial report to support the plaintiff’s evidence, I am of the view that he ought to be awarded some damages albeit on a nominal scale for the sole reason that denial of possession of his land must have certainly occasioned him some loss. Consequently I find that the sum of Kshs. 50,000/= claimed in the plaint is a reasonable sum.
6. I have considered the plaint and the evidence of the plaintiff. I consider that the plaintiff has established his claim against the defendant on a balance of probabilities.
7. I therefore enter judgment against the defendant and I make the following orders:
(a) A declaration that the plaintiff is the owner of the one acre out of the two acres occupied by the defendant in plot number 217 at Basale Farm.
(b) A permanent injunction to be issued restraining the defendant by himself through his agents and or employees from cultivating, utilizing, trespassing upon and/or dealing in any manner whatsoever with that portion of land no 217 in the larger Basale Farm measuring one (1) acre that the plaintiff did not sell to him.
(c) The defendant shall pay the plaintiff mesne profits of Kshs. 50,000/= (Kenya shillings Fifty Thousands only).
(d) The defendant shall bear the costs of this suit.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kitale on this 8th day of July, 2019.
MWANGI NJOROGE
JUDGE
18/7/2019
Coram:
Before - Hon. Mwangi Njoroge, Judge
Court Assistant - Picoty
N/A for the Plaintiff
N/A for the defendant
COURT
Judgment read in open court.
MWANGI NJOROGE
JUDGE
18/7/2019