[2023] KEELC 22375 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 22375 (KLR)

The court found that the application for release of rent and marking the matter as settled was premature because the core issue of ownership of the disputed plots (Webuye Township Plot No. 74 and 75) remains unresolved. The succession court had expressly directed that the Environment and Land Court must first...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 22375 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ashon Sikolia Wanyonyi; Applicant: Luka Makokha Wanyonyi; Defendant: Selina Namalwa Masoni; Defendant: Bungoma County Government; Tenant: Alexander Muchai
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 160 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Release of Rent and Marking Matter as Settled
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
EC Cherono
Legal Topics
Ownership Dispute, Succession and Administration, Injunctive Relief, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Ownership Dispute Succession and Administration Injunctive Relief Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ashon Sikolia Wanyonyi

Applicant

Luka Makokha Wanyonyi

Applicant

Selina Namalwa Masoni

Defendant

Bungoma County Government

Defendant

Alexander Muchai

Tenant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Release of Rent and Marking Matter as Settled

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to the release of rent deposited in court pursuant to the order dated 20th July 2018.
  2. 2 Whether the matter should be marked as fully settled and future rents handled by the administrators of the estate of Reuben Wanyonyi.
  3. 3 Whether the application is premature in light of unresolved ownership of the disputed plots.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for release of rent and marking the matter as settled was premature because the core issue of ownership of the disputed plots (Webuye Township Plot No. 74 and 75) remains unresolved. The succession court had expressly directed that the Environment and Land Court must first determine ownership before any further distribution or release of funds could occur. As such, the applicants are not entitled to the orders sought until the Environment and Land Court hears the parties and determines the bona fide owner of the properties in question. The court therefore dismissed the application and ordered that all rent continue to be deposited in court pending...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 14th July, 2023 is dismissed for lack of merit.
  • All rent shall continue to be deposited in court as earlier ordered on account of both the plaintiffs and the 1st defendant.