[2023] KECPT 842 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 842 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that while the Respondent may have had legitimate grounds to suspend the Claimant, the procedure for redress was not availed to him, specifically the right to appeal to the General Meeting. The Respondent's refusal to allow the Claimant to appeal, citing the pending court matter, was not justified...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 842 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Michael Wafula Wanyonyi; Respondent: Menu Farmers Cooperative Society
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 545 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
partly_allowed
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Cooperative Society Membership, Suspension Procedure, Right to Fair Hearing
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Cooperative Society Membership Suspension Procedure Right to Fair Hearing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Wafula Wanyonyi

Applicant

Menu Farmers Cooperative Society

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the suspension of the Claimant from the Cooperative Society was lawful and procedurally fair.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to compensation for loss of crop and membership rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that while the Respondent may have had legitimate grounds to suspend the Claimant, the procedure for redress was not availed to him, specifically the right to appeal to the General Meeting. The Respondent's refusal to allow the Claimant to appeal, citing the pending court matter, was not justified under the by-laws or the Cooperative Societies Act. However, the Claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claim for compensation for loss of crop and membership rights. Therefore, the Tribunal ordered the lifting of the suspension but declined to award general damages for lack of evidence.

Court Disposition

partly_allowed

Orders

  • The suspension of the Claimant is lifted.
  • The claim for compensation in general damages for loss of crop and membership rights is dismissed for lack of evidence.