[2023] KEHC 17730 (KLR)
The court found that, although the applicant's circumstances did not establish a clear flight risk, there existed compelling reasons to deny bail. These included the likelihood of interference with witnesses and the fact that ballistic investigations regarding a firearm and ammunition allegedly recovered from the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 17730 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Somo Dalacha Wario alias Simba; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E018 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- bail denied
- Judges
- EM Muriithi
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Flight Risk, Witness Interference, Ongoing Investigations
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Somo Dalacha Wario alias Simba
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny bail, including risk of interference with witnesses and ongoing investigations.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, although the applicant's circumstances did not establish a clear flight risk, there existed compelling reasons to deny bail. These included the likelihood of interference with witnesses and the fact that ballistic investigations regarding a firearm and ammunition allegedly recovered from the accused were ongoing. The possibility of additional charges arising from these investigations provided further incentive for the accused to abscond. The court held that the integrity of the prosecution and the completion of investigations should not be jeopardized by granting bail at this stage. Consequently, bail was denied, but the applicant was granted liberty to seek...
Court Disposition
bail denied
Orders
- Bail pending trial is denied to the applicant.
- Applicant may seek reconsideration of bail at a later stage if circumstances change.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Wario v Republic (Criminal Case E018 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 17730 (KLR) (18 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 17730 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Meru
Criminal Case E018 of 2023
EM Muriithi, J
May 18, 2023
Between
Somo Dalacha Wario alias Simba
Appellant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The court has considered the prosecution’s Affidavit in opposition of bail sworn by No 7672 Joseph Kibet on February 21, 2023.
2. The Court has also considered the Affidavit of the Accused Applicant Somo Dalacha Wario Alias Simba sworn on April 24,2023 in support of this application for bail pending trial.
3. The Applicant’s Affidavit apart from setting out the Constitutional right to bail under Article 49 only states that “ I am an herder and I live with my sister Zainab Dalacha at her family who shall stand surety for me and when called upon I can attend and without fail”.
4. The Prosecution’s Affidavit in opposition to bail raises three principal grounds for opposing bail that the applicant is a herder with no fixed abode; likelihood of interference with witness/deceased family members (which counsel for the deceased family supports); and the investigation and connection with other offences of robbery with violence and possession of a fire arm and ammunitions, the ballistic examinations and investigations on which is still on going.
5. The Court considers that the ability of the prosecution to effecting prosecution for offences should not be unduly tampered by orders of the court which impede investigations and or permit the interference with evidence or witnesses of the prosecution, or make it impossible to complete the prosecution upon absconding of an accused who is a clear flight risk.
6. While the court does not find that the accused’s circumstances are a flight risks, the likehood of interference with witnesses and the pending investigations of the ballistic examination of the gun allegedly received from the accused together with the round of ammunitions, which may result in other offences being preferred (and giving incentive for the accused’s absconding) present compelling grounds within meaning of Article 49(1) (h) of the ConstitutionBail is consequently denied.
7. Applicant may seek re-consideration of the issue of his bail at a later stage of the proceedings, in case of changed circumstances where crucial witnesses have testified and ongoing ballistic investigations completed.Order accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 18TH DAY OF MAY, 2023. EDWARD M. MURIITHIJUDGEAPPEARANCES:Mr. Igweta Advocate for Deceased’s family.Mr. Masila for DppMs. Thuo Advocate for Accused.