[2021] KECPT 601 (KLR)

[2021] KECPT 601 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant remained a member of the 1st Respondent and had deposited Kshs.200,000 for the benefit of the society. There was no evidence of outstanding liabilities or mismanagement directly attributable to the Claimant. The Respondents did not dispute the deposit or the Claimant's right to a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECPT 601 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Washington Silvanus Washiali Khwale; Respondent: Mumias Cane Farmers Co-operative Union Limited; Respondent: Mr. Alloysius Mandu
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 12B of 2018
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Legal Topics
Cooperative Societies, Refund of Deposits, Membership Rights
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Cooperative Societies Refund of Deposits Membership Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Washington Silvanus Washiali Khwale

Applicant

Mumias Cane Farmers Co-operative Union Limited

Respondent

Mr. Alloysius Mandu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Is the Claimant a member of the 1st Respondent?
  2. 2 Is the Claimant entitled to a refund of Kshs.200,000?
  3. 3 Should interim officials be constituted for the 1st Respondent?

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant remained a member of the 1st Respondent and had deposited Kshs.200,000 for the benefit of the society. There was no evidence of outstanding liabilities or mismanagement directly attributable to the Claimant. The Respondents did not dispute the deposit or the Claimant's right to a refund. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the Claimant was entitled to a refund of Kshs.200,000. The Tribunal declined to dissolve the current office or constitute an interim office due to lack of clarity on the current status of the 1st Respondent's officials. The Tribunal ordered the Commissioner of Co-operatives to file a report on the status of the 1st Respondent and...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Kshs.200,000 to be refunded to the Claimant.
  • Prayer for dissolution of the 2nd Respondent and officials is denied.