[2017] KEELRC 1322 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant was employed continuously by the respondent from February 2010 to February 2016 as a night watchman. The respondent failed to demonstrate that the claimant was paid the statutory minimum wage or that overtime and public holiday work were compensated. The court held that, by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELRC 1322 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Washington Waiganjo Wangombe; Respondent: Othaya Farmer’s Co-operative Society Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 124 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant.
- Judges
- B Ongaya
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Minimum Wage, Overtime Pay, Public Holiday Remuneration, Underpayment of Wages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Washington Waiganjo Wangombe
Claimant
Othaya Farmer’s Co-operative Society Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was underpaid in violation of statutory minimum wage requirements.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for overtime worked.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for work performed on public holidays.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant was employed continuously by the respondent from February 2010 to February 2016 as a night watchman. The respondent failed to demonstrate that the claimant was paid the statutory minimum wage or that overtime and public holiday work were compensated. The court held that, by operation of section 37 of the Employment Act, the claimant's employment was subject to statutory minimum terms. The evidence showed that the claimant was underpaid, and the amounts claimed for underpayment, overtime, and public holidays were not rebutted by the respondent. The respondent's failure to provide bank statements or other proof of payment was decisive. Accordingly, the...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant.
Orders
- The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.323,196.00 for underpayment of wages.
- The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.367,773.00 for unpaid overtime.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
CAUSE NO.124 OF 2016
WASHINGTON WAIGANJO WANGOMBE..................................... CLAIMANT
VERSUS
OTHAYA FARMER’S CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED..... RESPONDENT
(Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Thursday, 25th May, 2017)
JUDGMENT
The claimant filed the memorandum of claim on 02. 06. 2016 in person. The claimant prayed for judgment against the respondent for payment of unpaid work on public holidays Kshs.37, 180. 00; unpaid salary of Kshs.323, 196. 00; unpaid overtime hours Kshs.367, 773. 00; costs of the suit and interest; and any other relief the honourable court may deem fit and just to grant.
The respondent filed the memorandum of response on 21. 07. 2016 through Sichangi & Company Advocates. The respondent prayed that the claimant’s suit be dismissed with costs. The claimant filed the reply to response on 04. 08. 2016.
The parties agreed that the suit be determined on the basis of the pleadings, documents, witness statements and final submissions on record.
There is no dispute between the parties that the claimant was employed by the respondent in February 2010 as a night watchman and deployed at Gichihi Coffee Factory in a place known as Othaya. It is not in dispute that the claimant served uninterrupted up to February 2016 when he left employment due to poor health.
The main and only issue for determination is whether the claimant is entitled to the remedies as prayed for. The court makes findings as follows:
1. The claimant has stated that he was underpaid throughout his service and has computed the underpayment dues in paragraph 15 of the statement of claim. The respondent has filed documents showing the amount paid to the claimant over the period of service but has not showed that minimum statutory wages were paid and as claimed by the claimant. It is not denied that the claimant served without a break in service and therefore his service must have converted to one based upon minimum statutory terms and conditions of service as envisaged in section 37 of the Employment Act, 2007. Accordingly, the court returns that the claimant is entitled to payment for underpayment as claimed and is awarded Kshs.323, 196. 00 as prayed for.
2. The material on record show that parties are in agreement that the claimant worked overtime throughout his employment. There is no evidence that the overtime was paid and if it was so paid, it was included in the monthly pay and the court returns that the computed monthly pay was nevertheless below the minimum wage so that the overtime as computed remained unpaid. In the circumstances, the court returns that the claimant is entitled to the overtime as claimed and is awarded Kshs.367, 773. 00 as prayed for and as computed in the statement of claim.
3. The respondent has filed summaries showing that the claimant worked overtime. There is no evidence that the overtime was paid and if it was paid, then it was included in the monthly pay which was below the statutory minimum wage and the work on public holidays, therefore, remains unpaid. Accordingly, in absence of any other material on record, the court returns that the claimant was not paid for public holidays worked and is awarded Kshs.37,180. 00 as computed, claimed and prayed for.
4. The respondent to pay the claimant the costs of the suit fixed at Kshs.30, 000. 00.
While making the findings the court observes that the respondent was given an opportunity to file bank statements to show that the claimant was paid the amounts as claimed, particularly for overtime and public holidays worked, but the bank statements were not filed.
In conclusion, judgment is hereby entered for the claimant against the respondent for the respondent to pay the claimant Kshs.758, 149. 00 by 01. 08. 2017 failing interest to be payable thereon at court rates from the date of this judgment till the date of full payment.
Signed, datedanddeliveredin court atNyerithisThursday, 25th May, 2017.
BYRAM ONGAYA
JUDGE