[2020] KEHC 5929 (KLR)
The court declined to grant leave to apply for an order of mandamus at this stage because the applicant failed to annex a certified copy of the judgment delivered in Milimani CMCC No. 5591 of 2018, which is the foundational document giving rise to the Certificate of Order and the relief sought. The absence of this...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 5929 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Wayrren Enterprises Limited; Respondent: The County Secretary, Nairobi City County; Respondent: The Chief Officer/County Treasurer, Nairobi City County
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Application 98 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave Application and Directions
- Outcome
- Leave to apply for mandamus not granted at this stage; directions issued for further filings and hearing.
- Judges
- P Nyamweya
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Enforcement of Judgments
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wayrren Enterprises Limited
Applicant
The County Secretary, Nairobi City County
Respondent
The Chief Officer/County Treasurer, Nairobi City County
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave Application and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated an arguable case for leave to apply for an order of mandamus.
- 2 Whether the absence of a certified copy of the judgment precludes the grant of leave for judicial review.
Ratio Decidendi
The court declined to grant leave to apply for an order of mandamus at this stage because the applicant failed to annex a certified copy of the judgment delivered in Milimani CMCC No. 5591 of 2018, which is the foundational document giving rise to the Certificate of Order and the relief sought. The absence of this judgment means the applicant has not demonstrated an arguable case as required for leave in judicial review proceedings. The court, however, granted the applicant leave to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the certified judgment within thirty days, and issued directions for further service and filings to facilitate a substantive hearing once the procedural deficiency is...
Court Disposition
Leave to apply for mandamus not granted at this stage; directions issued for further filings and hearing.
Orders
- Applicant to file a supplementary affidavit annexing a certified copy of the judgment within thirty days.
- Applicant to serve respondents with all relevant documents and hearing notice within thirty days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 98 OF 2020
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE
FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF MANDAMUS
BETWEEN
WAYRREN ENTERPRISES LIMITED...............................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE COUNTY SECRETARY,NAIROBI CITY COUNTY...................................1ST RESPONDENT
THE CHIEF OFFICER/COUNTY TREASURES,NAIROBI CITY COUNTY...1ST RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Applicant herein moved this Court in an application brought by way of Chamber Summons dated 12th May 2020, wherein he is seeking orders that the application be certified urgent and be heard ex parte in the first instance, and for leave to apply for an order of mandamus to compel the Respondents to satisfy the Certificate of Order in Milimani CMCC No. 5591 of 2018 together with interest thereon at the rate of 25% per annum from 13th September 2013 until payment in full. The Applicant also sought an order that the costs of the application be provided for.
2. The said application is supported by a statement dated 12th May 2020, and a verifying affidavit and supplementary affidavit sworn on the same date by Berline Adhiambo, the Applicant’s Managing Director.
3. The main ground for the application is that the Applicant has a Certificate of Order against the Respondents which they are not willing to satisfy, and which remains unsatisfied since 28th January 2020.
4. The Applicant annexed copies of the pleadings filed in Milimani CMCC No. 5591 of 2018, and a Certificate of Order against the Government issued therein on 28th January 2020. The Applicant has averred in its supporting affidavits that the matter in Milimani CMCC No. 5591 of 2018 went to full trial, and judgment was delivered therein in its favor on 26th April 2019. However, the Applicant has not annexed a copy of the said judgment, which is the main fact that gives rise to the Certificate of Order against the Government and orders of mandamus sought. In the circumstances I am unable to grant leave at this stage as the Applicant has not shown an arguable case.
5. In the premises I direct and orders as follows:
i. The Applicant is granted leave to file a supplementary affidavit annexing a certified copy of the judgment deliveredon 26th April 2019inMilimani CMCC No. 5591 of 2018, within thirty (30) days of today’s date.
ii. The Applicant shall serve the Respondents with (i) theChamber Summons dated 12th May 2020 and its supporting documents, (ii) its supplementary affidavit, (iii) skeletal submissions on the Chamber Summons dated 12th May 2020, (iv) a copy of these directions and (v) a hearing notice with the said thirty (30) days.
iii. The Respondents are granted leave to file and serve their response to theChamber Summons dated 12th May 2020 and skeletal submissions thereon within thirty (30) days of service by the Applicant as directed herein.
iv. The Chamber Summons dated 12th May 2020 shall be heard on13thJuly 2020.
v. In view of the Ministry of Health directives on the safeguards to be observed to stem the spread of the current COVID-19 pandemic, this Court shall hear and determine the Applicant’s Chamber Summons dated 12th May 2020 on the basis of the electronic copies of the pleadings and the written submissions filed by the parties.In this respect, the Applicant shall avail an electronic copy in word format of the said Chamber Summons without the annexures within thirty (30) days of today’s date.
vi. The parties shall file and avail their pleadings, applications and written submissions electronically, by sending them to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies to asunachristine51@gmail.com.
vii. The electronic copies of pleadings and documents sent by the parties shall be clearly and correctly titled to indicate the J.R Case Number, the name of the Party sending it (that is whether the Ex Parte Applicant, Respondent or Interested Party), and the nature of the pleading or document.
viii. The service of pleadings and documents directed by the Court shall be by way of personal service andelectronic mail, and in the case of service by way of electronic mail, the parties shall also email a copy of the documents so served to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies toasunachristine51@gmail.com.
ix. The parties shall also be required to send the respective affidavits of service by way of electronic mail to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies toasunachristine51@gmail.com.
x. The Deputy Registrar ofthe Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of this ruling and the extracted orders to the Applicant by electronic mail by close of business on Thursday,14th May 2020.
xi. The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall put this matter on the Division’s causelist for hearing on 13thJuly 2020,and bring it to the attention of a Judge in the Division on that date for directions.
xii. Parties shall be at liberty to apply.
6. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY 2020
P. NYAMWEYA
JUDGE