[2022] KECA 1061 (KLR)

[2022] KECA 1061 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the record of appeal was only one day and was occasioned by a court directive to re-file due to a documentation error. The applicant acted promptly and brought the application for extension of time within the period allowed by the court's earlier ruling. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KECA 1061 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kennedy Ellam Wekesa (As the Legal Representative Of The Estate Of George Elam Wekesa); Respondent: Sheikh Ali Taib; Respondent: Abdalla Ali Taib; Respondent: Selina Wekesa Wekesa
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) 51 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal
Outcome
application granted
Judges
JW Lessit
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Record of Appeal, Delay in Filing
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Record of Appeal Delay in Filing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennedy Ellam Wekesa (As the Legal Representative Of The Estate Of George Elam Wekesa)

Applicant

Sheikh Ali Taib

Respondent

Abdalla Ali Taib

Respondent

Selina Wekesa Wekesa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file the record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the record of appeal was excusable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the record of appeal was only one day and was occasioned by a court directive to re-file due to a documentation error. The applicant acted promptly and brought the application for extension of time within the period allowed by the court's earlier ruling. The court exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant, finding the order sought merited in all the circumstances, particularly given the minimal delay and absence of opposition from the respondents.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 4th May 2022 is granted in terms of order 1 and 2.
  • The applicant shall serve the Record of Appeal upon the respondents within 14 days from the date of this ruling.