Welal & 2 others v Hassan & another (Commercial Civil Suit E375 of 2022) [2026] KEHC 6419 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (12 May 2026) (Ruling)

Welal & 2 others v Hassan & another (Commercial Civil Suit E375 of 2022) [2026] KEHC 6419 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (12 May 2026) (Ruling)

The court declined to review the earlier orders because that prayer had been overtaken by events, but enforced a transparent interim management mechanism by ordering all rental income to be deposited into a joint interest earning account and directing an independent audit from December 2019 to date, since both sides...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 6419 (KLR)
Parties
1st Plaintiff: Habiba Ali Welal; 2nd Plaintiff: Batula Ali Welal; 3rd Plaintiff: Muna Ali Welal; 1st Defendant: Adan Yare Hassan; 2nd Defendant: Fatuma Abdulkadir Ali
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Commercial Civil Suit E375 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Commercial Civil Suit / Ruling on Two Competing Interlocutory Applications
Outcome
Partly allowed and partly dismissed
Judges
["FG Mugambi"]
Legal Topics
Review of Court Orders, Interlocutory Injunction, Joint Bank Account for Rent, Accounting and Audit of Rental Income, Utility Disconnection Dispute, Mediated Settlement Failure, Costs of Applications
Source Language
en
Commercial Law Civil Procedure Property Law Landlord Tenant Dispute Review of Court Orders Interlocutory Injunction Joint Bank Account for Rent Accounting and Audit of Rental Income +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Habiba Ali Welal

1st Plaintiff

Batula Ali Welal

2nd Plaintiff

Muna Ali Welal

3rd Plaintiff

Adan Yare Hassan

1st Defendant

Fatuma Abdulkadir Ali

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Civil Suit / Ruling on Two Competing Interlocutory Applications

  1. 1 Whether the orders issued on 28 July 2023 should be reviewed, varied, or set aside
  2. 2 Whether rent from the suit premises should be deposited into a joint interest earning account
  3. 3 Whether the court should order an independent audit of rental income from December 2019 to date

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to review the earlier orders because that prayer had been overtaken by events, but enforced a transparent interim management mechanism by ordering all rental income to be deposited into a joint interest earning account and directing an independent audit from December 2019 to date, since both sides accepted the need for accountability and no evidence supported the electricity-related complaints.

Court Disposition

Partly allowed and partly dismissed

Orders

  • The prayer for review, variation, or setting aside of the orders of 28 July 2023 is declined.
  • Pending hearing and final determination of the suit, all rental income from the suit premises shall be deposited into a joint interest earning bank account in the names of the plaintiffs and the defendants to be opened within the next 30 days.