https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc-dr/2026/1

Were v Bonyo (Miscellaneous Application E1696 of 2025) [2026] KEHC-DR 1 (KLR) (30 June 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC-DR 1 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nairobi Milimani Commercial Courts (DR) Miscellaneous Application E1696 of 2025 LA Mumassabba, PDR June 30, 2026 J.W.WAMBUA &COMPANY ADVOCATES ...................... APPLICANT -VERSUS- AFRICA MERCHANT ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD ......... RESPONDENT ARISING FROM REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE CHIEF MAGISTRATES COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS CIVIL SUIT NO 8813 OF 2016 Between Alex Okonya Were Plaintiff and Charles Owur Bonyo Defendant Ruling Introduction 1.The Applicant filed an Advocate-Client Bill of Costs dated 28th October ,2025 urging the Taxing Officer to tax the same at Kshs.144,114.00 The Bill of Costs relates to legal fees for representing the Respondent in Civil Suit No 8813 of 2016 in which the Applicant herein represented the Respondent. 2.Although the parties engaged in negotiations, they did not reach a settlement. The Respondent did not file a response to the Bill of Costs, rendering the Bill unopposed. Nevertheless, the court remains under a duty to scrutinize the Bill carefully to ensure that it is properly drawn and that the costs claimed are in accordance with the applicable law and scale. The Law 3.I have carefully considered the Bill of Costs filed by the Applicant herein. This is a matter the Applicant was instructed in the year 2017 and hence the applicable Advocates Remuneration (Amendment) Order is that of 2014. Item No.1 – Instruction Fees 4.The Applicant seeks Kshs.60,000.00. The Law 5.The Applicable law is Schedule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) (Amendment) No. 2 Order, 2014.In the case of Joreth Limited -vs- Kigano & Associates, Civil Appeal No. 66 of 1997 [2002] 1 E.A 92, the Court of Appeal held as follows: “We would at this stage point out that the value of the subject matter of a suit, for the purposes of taxation of a Bill of Costs ought to be determined from the Pleadings, Judgment or settlement (if such be the case), but if the same is not ascertainable, the taxing officer is entitled to use his discretion to assess such instruction fee as he considers just, taking into account, amongst other matters, the nature and importance of the cause or matter, the interest of the parties, the general conduct of the proceedings, any directions by the trial Judge and all other relevant circumstances.” 6.It is therefore trite law that the instructions fees is calculated from the value of the subject matter which is discerned from the Pleadings, Judgement or Settlement. 7.In the instant case, the value of the subject matter as per the Pleadings is Kshs.406,400.00 .The higher scale shall be applied as the matter was defended. This item is reasonably drawn to scale and is taxed as drawn. Item No.2 -14 8.These items relate to attendances, service and filing. They are reasonably drawn to scale and I tax them as drawn Conclusion B 9.Based on the foregoing therefore, the Advocate-Client Bill of Costs dated 28th October,2025 is reasonably drawn to scale and is taxed as drawn at Kshs144,114.00 (Kenya Shillings one hundred and fourty four thousand, one hundred and fourteen ) 10.14 Days Right to file a Reference. L.A. MUMASSABBAPRINCIPAL DEPUTY REGISTRAR30.6.2026RULING DATED, READ, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS PLATFORM THIS 30TH DAY OF JUNE ,2026In the Presence of:M/s Karanja for the Applicant.Respondent:AbsentCourt Assistant: Phoebe