[2009] KEHC 1433 (KLR)
The court found that the conviction of the appellants was unsafe and unsatisfactory due to the lack of evidence identifying the appellants to the arresting officers and the failure to recover the stolen money. The appellate court, upon re-evaluating the evidence, determined that the prosecution did not prove the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 1433 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Wesley Kipngetich Chumba; Appellant: Wycliffe Khayumbi Khaisangu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 74 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed
- Judges
- JL Osiemo, PM Mwilu
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Appeals Against Conviction, Identification Evidence, Standard of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wesley Kipngetich Chumba
Appellant
Wycliffe Khayumbi Khaisangu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction of the appellants for robbery with violence was safe and satisfactory.
- 2 Whether there was sufficient evidence to identify the appellants as the perpetrators of the offence.
- 3 Whether the failure to recover the stolen money or identify the appellants to the arresting officers affected the integrity of the conviction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the conviction of the appellants was unsafe and unsatisfactory due to the lack of evidence identifying the appellants to the arresting officers and the failure to recover the stolen money. The appellate court, upon re-evaluating the evidence, determined that the prosecution did not prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The State Counsel's concession further underscored the weakness of the prosecution's case. Consequently, the court quashed the convictions and set aside the sentences, ordering the immediate release of the appellants unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed
Orders
- The convictions are quashed.
- The sentences are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
WESLEY KIPNGETICH CHUMBA ……….… 1ST APPELLANT
WYCLIFFE KHAYUMBI KHAISANGU …....... 2ND APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ……………………….………….…… RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The two Appellants WYCLIFFE KHAYUMBI KHAISANGU and WESLEY KIPNGETICH CHUMBA were tried and convicted before Kapsabet Senior Resident Magistrate (S. Atonga Esq.) for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296 (2) of the Penal Code. Upon their conviction they were sentenced to death, which is the only punishment prescribed by law. They have now appealed to this Court against both conviction and sentence.
It was the prosecution case that on 27th December, 2004 at about 11 a.m. the Complainant was with ALEX KIPKOSKEI (PW 2) taking local brew (Busaa) at Surungai in Kapsabet Town when Wesley Chumba the second Appellant who was also taking the local brew at the same place decided to attack both Complainants. The first Appellant held Adam Morogo (PW 1) by the neck and knocked him down and snatched a wallet from him which contained cash Shs. 5,000/=. The Appellants then escaped. The matter was reported to the police at Kapsabet Police Station. Later the Appellants were arrested and charged with this offence.
After the trial Magistrate listened to the prosecution evidence and the defence found the Appellants guilty. There is no evidence as to who identified the Appellants to the Police officers who arrested them and the robbed money was never recovered.
It is trite that it is our duty as the first Appellate Court to consider the evidence, evaluate it and draw our own conclusion in order to satisfy ourselves that there was no failure of justice and after we have done that, we have no doubt that the Appellants’ convictions are both unsafe and unsatisfactory. The learned State Counsel does not support the conviction and rightly so in our view.
The appeal is allowed the convictions are quashed, sentences set aside and we order that the Appellants be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
DATED AT ELDORET THIS 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009.
J. L. A. OSIEMO
JUDGE
P. M. MWILU
JUDGE